Question:

I have divined that the top Christian leader of 50 AD was female. The term pope was not used then but she was effectively a pope. And if the Eastern Orthodox Pope gets a sex change she will be a female pope as well.    But of course non-sex-changed originally female form women should have a shot too. See my notes in   the  "OT: weekend plans"  thread on alt.music.s-mclachlan  as well for the bit on the mystic suppression spells I have funneled.    The three Roman Catholic Cardinals mentioned applied each of their three spells to the Eastern Orthodox Pope six years ago and he should now have the adjusted versions of the spells on him instead and may be able to divine who the three Cardinals are and have a word with them. Those with divination ability, such as him, can verify the divination of the first line above by reading it and divining whether it is correct or incorrect. David http://www.nfld.com/~dalton

Response:

I have divined that the top Christian leader of 50 AD was female. The term pope was not used then but she was effectively a pope. And if the Eastern Orthodox Pope gets a sex change she will be a female pope as well.    But of course non-sex-changed originally female form women should have a shot too.

***The Eastern Orthodox do not have a pope, you deranged nutcase!!

Response:

Question:

Some friends and I have been debating this recently. Is it possible for the Pope to be removed from being the Pope by anyone but himself / death ? Any links to proof of this either way would be appreciated. Thanks

Response:

Only if provided for in canon law.  there is no such canon law

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Some friends and I have been debating this recently. Is it possible for the Pope to be removed from being the Pope by anyone but himself / death ? Any links to proof of this either way would be appreciated. Thanks

Response:

Some friends and I have been debating this recently. Is it possible for the Pope to be removed from being the Pope by anyone but himself / death ? Any links to proof of this either way would be appreciated.

Question:

pontificated: The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week, Saturday, that God hallowed, and determined that it was SO important that He made it one of the ten commandments set in stone. THAT’S the best an omnipotent God can do when something is SO important? MAN can do that.

So you would say that God should communicate to man in a way man can understand and yet, insult God when He does.  How nice. — Pastor Dave Raymond "I have more understanding than all my teachers: for thy testimonies are my meditation." – Psalm 119:99                / o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::                 "And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:" – Ephesians 6:17

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ? My understanding of this is Moses’ commandment of keeping the Sabbath holy as being the 7th day of the week (Saturday) is mearly the "image" of the true Sabbath when God rested after the creation.   This true Sabbath, when God rested, in my opinion, doesn’t speak of a day as such, but of an era where man is given the responsibility of taking good care of  his creation, in obediance to His laws. Therefore, the true Sabbath is not a single day but every moment of ones life.

The word of God says it is a day.  The creation is referenced with the work week and the Sabbath. Exodus 20:8-11 8) Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9) Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10) But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11) For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. You either believe God, or you don’t.  He said "six days".  Anything else you say, is adding to the Bible, since the Bible says, "six days".  You theistic evolutionists, can speculate about the "six days" all you want, but that’s all you have, is speculation. When you try to make it into millions of years, you have a big problem Scripturally. Speaking of this seven day period (six days and the Sabbath) and keeping the statement about this six days in the context in which it is quoted from, did God command man to work six millions years and rest for one million years?  No.  It’s clear that He is talking about six literal days of Creation, when the passage is taken in context.  In order to make it anything other than six literal days, you have to rip it out of its context, which is the Sabbath day rest. The fact is, that "In the beginning, God created"… And He did it in six days and said He did it in six days (Exodus 20:11).  Jesus believed that and referenced it, in Matthew 19:3-8 and in other places. Going back to Genesis, it is important to note something about the word usage there in the original language (Hebrew).  The original Hebrew word for "day" ("yom"), is never used to mean anything but a literal day in the Bible, when a numerical adjective is present ("second, third, etc.).  Are we to believe that this is somehow the one and only exception and that God would start out His word with a deception? Now people will try to tell me that God used language that "ignorant, primitive man could understand". That’s ridiculous!  First off, man was a lot smarter then, than we give him credit for.  Language, for example, gets much more complex, the farther we go back and it has taken scholars decades to even begin to decipher some of them.  The Egyptians had batteries thousands of years ago, etc..  Secondly, what is so hard to understand about God saying… "First there were animals, including apes and God brought man forth from these apes".  No, it isn’t difficult at all to tell man in that time, that we came from apes.  You may claim that man wouldn’t understand the mechanisms involved.  Well, even if everything was created in six days, as I contend, man still wouldn’t understand the mechanisms involved.  In fact, we still wouldn’t now, so what’s the difference? — Pastor Dave Raymond "I have more understanding than all my teachers: for thy testimonies are my meditation." – Psalm 119:99                / o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::                 "And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:" – Ephesians 6:17

Response:

Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ?

My understanding of this is Moses’ commandment of keeping the Sabbath holy as being the 7th day of the week (Saturday) is mearly the "image" of the true Sabbath when God rested after the creation.    This true Sabbath, when God rested, in my opinion, doesn’t speak of a day as such, but of an era where man is given the responsibility of taking good care of  his creation, in obediance to His laws. Therefore, the true Sabbath is not a single day but every moment of ones life.   Since humanity could not have the capacity of keeping the commandement, due to the fallen nature received after the fall, a New creation/birth was needed for humanity to receive in order to be capable of following God’s law, and this was accomplished on the first day of the New Creation, that is, on the day of the resurection(Sunday), which, in itself is, again, a type/symbol of the true day of the New creation being the day of the General Resurection.   Therefore, a catholic christian follows Sunday instead of Saturday as symbolically looking towards the day of resurection instead of working in trying to follow God’s law through our fallen nature. Andre

Response:

THAT’S the best an omnipotent God can do when something is SO important? MAN can do that. It’s SO important that not only is His handiwork here indistinguishable from anyone who owned a chisel, but His handiwork isn’t even around anymore for folks to be impressed by it, this being a good deal LESS impressive than many stones carved by men. For all the supposed things God is supposed to have done, all we are really left with is a human being standing here, pointing to a storybook, and telling me it’s true. Impress us if you’re going to impress us, is all I’m saying.

Impress me by writing ten commandments in stone with just YOUR finger, as God did. — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week, Saturday, that God hallowed, and determined that it was SO important that He made it one of the ten commandments set in stone. THAT’S the best an omnipotent God can do when something is SO important? MAN can do that. It’s SO important that not only is His handiwork here indistinguishable from anyone who owned a chisel, but His handiwork isn’t even around anymore for folks to be impressed by it, this being a good deal LESS impressive than many stones carved by men. For all the supposed things God is supposed to have done, all we are really left with is a human being standing here, pointing to a storybook, and telling me it’s true. Impress us if you’re going to impress us, is all I’m saying.

Response:

1) Can you keep the whole commandments of God ? Not failing even to one ? Of course, it is easy when you LOVE GOD with ALL of your heart, mind, soul and STRENGTH, as well as with the conviction, guidance and help of the Holy Spirit, disciplining yourself into His kingdom, ways, will, spirit and truth.

Ga:3:22: But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.

Response:

1) Can you keep the whole commandments of God ? Not failing even to one ? Of course, it is easy when you LOVE GOD with ALL of your heart, mind, soul and STRENGTH, as well as with the conviction, guidance and help of the Holy Spirit, disciplining yourself into His kingdom, ways, will, spirit and truth.

1John1:8: If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. I can’t believe you think you’re perfect and sinless. 2) When that "Sabbath rest" was first preached, did anyone entered into that rest ? As I said, the Jews did after Moses came down from the mountain and still honor the seventh day, Saturday, as the Sabbath today.

Heb:4:4: For he spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, And God did rest the seventh day from all his works. Heb:4:5: And in this place again, If they shall enter into my rest. Heb:4:6: Seeing therefore it remaineth that some must enter therein, and they to whom it was first preached entered not in because of unbelief:

Response:

WHO is to observe Sabbath? 16. The Israelites are to observe the Sabbath… WHO? 17 It will be a sign between me and the ISRAELITES forever…

And who are the NEW Jews, the NEW Israelites after the new covenant was given? The Sabbath, as ALL commandments are for ALL of God’s children. Rom 2:28-29 28         For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29         But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God Matt 21:43 43         Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof. Luke 20:14-16 14         But when the husbandmen saw him, they reasoned among themselves, saying, This is the heir: come, let us kill him, that the inheritance may be ours. 15         So they cast him out of the vineyard, and killed him. What therefore shall the lord of the vineyard do unto them? 16         He shall come and destroy these husbandmen, and shall give the vineyard to others. And when they heard it, they said, God forbid. Matt 9:15-17 15         And Jesus said unto them, Can the children of the bridechamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them? but the days will come, when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast. 16         No man putteth a piece of new cloth unto an old garment, for that which is put in to fill it up taketh from the garment, and the rent is made worse. 17         Neither do men put new wine into old bottles: else the bottles break, and the wine runneth out, and the bottles perish: but they put new wine into new bottles, and both are preserved. — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive: yes  copyright 2004 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the group) "Who is to observe Sabbath?"  The Israelites (the Jews) are to observe Sabbath… NO, the ten commandments, including the seventh day Sabbath, was written in STONE by the hand of God for ALL mankind to honor and obey, NOT just the Israelites. Yes! EX 31:16-17 16 The Israelites are to observe the Sabbath, celebrating it for the generations to come as a lasting covenant. 17 It will be a sign between me and the Israelites forever, for in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day he abstained from work and rested.’ " WHO is to observe Sabbath? 16. The Israelites are to observe the Sabbath… WHO? 17 It will be a sign between me and the ISRAELITES forever… jw Rev 14:12 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. KJV And the Christians’ "Sabbath rest" is Jesus Christ. Christ also said to observe the commandments. Matt 19:16-17 16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. KJV God bless! j w

Response:

1) Can you keep the whole commandments of God ? Not failing even to one ?

Of course, it is easy when you LOVE GOD with ALL of your heart, mind, soul and STRENGTH, as well as with the conviction, guidance and help of the Holy Spirit, disciplining yourself into His kingdom, ways, will, spirit and truth. cont 2) When that "Sabbath rest" was first preached, did anyone entered into that rest ?

As I said, the Jews did after Moses came down from the mountain and still honor the seventh day, Saturday, as the Sabbath today. — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "Who is to observe Sabbath?"  The Israelites (the Jews) are to observe Sabbath… NO, the ten commandments, including the seventh day Sabbath, was written in STONE by the hand of God for ALL mankind to honor and obey, NOT just the Israelites. Rev 14:12 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. KJV And the Christians’ "Sabbath rest" is Jesus Christ. Christ also said to observe the commandments. Christ gave us meaning to the OT laws & commandments. Matt 19:16-17 16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. KJV — Dore 1) Can you keep the whole commandments of God ? Not failing even to one ? 2) When that "Sabbath rest" was first preached, did anyone entered into that rest ?

Response:

WHY NOT ASK GOD ABOUT THE SABBATH A. "Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." Matt. 5:17

What was the purpose or meaning of the Sabbath rest? Did it really happen? What was it all about? Do you know how the Sabbath rest was fulfilled? THINK before answering.

Response:

The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week, Saturday, that God hallowed, and determined that it was SO important that He made it one of the ten commandments set in stone.

THAT’S the best an omnipotent God can do when something is SO important? MAN can do that. It’s SO important that not only is His handiwork here indistinguishable from anyone who owned a chisel, but His handiwork isn’t even around anymore for folks to be impressed by it, this being a good deal LESS impressive than many stones carved by men. For all the supposed things God is supposed to have done, all we are really left with is a human being standing here, pointing to a storybook, and telling me it’s true. Impress us if you’re going to impress us, is all I’m saying.

Response:

WHY NOT ASK GOD ABOUT THE SABBATH … It’s easy to put verses together which is out of context. Answer this: Is that saturday (7th day of the week), is the same 7th day of the week on that day when God rested ? Are you so sure that the days stays the same in sequence order up to now ? read Isaiah 58:12-14

You didn’t understand the question. Is the count or numbering system in days that we use now in this period of time is the same as in the beginning ? What if 1 day was added to adjust the season, or when using BC & AD, the names or start count of days changed or similar to that.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – "Who is to observe Sabbath?"  The Israelites (the Jews) are to observe Sabbath… NO, the ten commandments, including the seventh day Sabbath, was written in STONE by the hand of God for ALL mankind to honor and obey, NOT just the Israelites. Rev 14:12 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. KJV And the Christians’ "Sabbath rest" is Jesus Christ. Christ also said to observe the commandments.

Christ gave us meaning to the OT laws & commandments. Matt 19:16-17 16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. KJV — Dore

1) Can you keep the whole commandments of God ? Not failing even to one ? 2) When that "Sabbath rest" was first preached, did anyone entered into that rest ?

Response:

Yes.  The "Sabbath" in the Old Testament was a very special event signifying a very special relationship between God and the Israelis.

Israelis?

Response:

"Who is to observe Sabbath?"  The Israelites (the Jews) are to observe Sabbath…

NO, the ten commandments, including the seventh day Sabbath, was written in STONE by the hand of God for ALL mankind to honor and obey, NOT just the Israelites. Rev 14:12 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. KJV And the Christians’ "Sabbath rest" is Jesus Christ.

Christ also said to observe the commandments. Matt 19:16-17 16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life? 17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments. KJV — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive: yes  copyright 2004 John Weatherly all rights reserved (keep it in the group) Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? Yes.  The "Sabbath" in the Old Testament was a very special event signifying a very special relationship between God and the Israelis. ex 31: 16-17 14 " `Observe the Sabbath, because it is holy to you. Anyone who desecrates it must be put to death; whoever does any work on that day must be cut off from his people. 15 For six days, work is to be done, but the seventh day is a Sabbath of rest, holy to the LORD. Whoever does any work on the Sabbath day must be put to death. 16 The Israelites are to observe the Sabbath, celebrating it for the generations to come as a lasting covenant. "Who is to observe Sabbath?"  The Israelites (the Jews) are to observe Sabbath… 17 It will be a sign between me and the Israelites forever, for in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, and on the seventh day he abstained from work and rested.’ " "WHO is to observe Sabbath? 17 It will be a sign between me and the Israelites forever, for in six What is really the Sabbath ? The Sabbath has been– and is– the "Seventh Day after the 1st Day". On the Jewish/Christian calendar, the Sabbath is Saturday. And the Christians’ "Sabbath rest" is Jesus Christ. jw God bless! j w

Response:

WHY NOT ASK GOD ABOUT THE SABBATH

… It’s easy to put verses together which is out of context. Answer this: Is that saturday (7th day of the week), is the same 7th day of the week on that day when God rested ? Are you so sure that the days stays the same in sequence order up to now ?

Response:

WHY NOT ASK GOD ABOUT THE SABBATH … It’s easy to put verses together which is out of context. Answer this: Is that saturday (7th day of the week), is the same 7th day of the week on that day when God rested ? Are you so sure that the days stays the same in sequence order up to now ?

read Isaiah 58:12-14

Response:

Can you give me specific levels or examples on what is that "rest from his labors" ? Don’t cook ? Don’t carry heavy things ? (How heavy?) What are those labors ? Is it anything that you get tired off ? Please explain.

Because the sabbath was made for man, it was not to be a burden, therefore, you are to rest from your normal every day work. And don’t do things that are not necessary for that day, like mowing the lawn, going to your place of employment, painting the house, shopping, fixing the car etc. It is a day for you to take a break and let your body rest from working on all of your earthly duties, to replenish your body, so that you can have the strength to go on. You have to eat, but make something easy and simple or go out to eat. Enjoy the day and take your mind and body off of the things of this world that cause worry, concern, efforts and stress and then don’t forget to thank God for giving you this wonderful day of  rest. Isa 58:13-14 13 If thou turn away thy foot from the sabbath, from doing thy pleasure on my holy day; and call the sabbath a delight, the holy of the LORD, honourable; and shalt honour him, not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words: 14 Then shalt thou delight thyself in the LORD; and I will cause thee to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed thee with the heritage of Jacob thy father: for the mouth of the LORD hath spoken it. KJV — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ? The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week, Saturday, that God hallowed, and determined that it was SO important that He made it one of the ten commandments set in stone. It is the day that man is to rest from his labors. There is NO difference in the OT and the NT, for as I said, these commandments were set in stone,  meaning that they are valid until the end of time on the earth. Can you give me specific levels or examples on what is that "rest from his labors" ? Don’t cook ? Don’t carry heavy things ? (How heavy?) What are those labors ? Is it anything that you get tired off ? Please explain.

Response:

What is actually the Sabbath rest?

Staying home on Sundays and saving 10%.

Response:

Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ?

The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week, Saturday, that God hallowed, and determined that it was SO important that He made it one of the ten commandments set in stone. It is the day that man is to rest from his labors. There is NO difference in the OT and the NT, for as I said, these commandments were set in stone,  meaning that they are valid until the end of time on the earth. Ex 20:8-11 8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates: 11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it. KJV Rev 14:12 12 Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. KJV — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ?

Response:

Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ? The Sabbath is the seventh day of the week, Saturday, that God hallowed, and determined that it was SO important that He made it one of the ten commandments set in stone. It is the day that man is to rest from his labors. There is NO difference in the OT and the NT, for as I said, these commandments were set in stone,  meaning that they are valid until the end of time on the earth.

Can you give me specific levels or examples on what is that "rest from his labors" ? Don’t cook ? Don’t carry heavy things ? (How heavy?) What are those labors ? Is it anything that you get tired off ? Please explain.

Response:

Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ?

Response:

Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ?

It shouldn’t be.  Jesus supposedly said he didn’t come to abolish the law. What is really the Sabbath ?

Saturday?

Response:

read this http://www.tagnet.org/llt/sabbath_reasons.shtml

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ?

Response:

all people love cupcakes, "Streamer" Lots of people give different views on Sabbath. Is the Sabbath in the OT different in NT ? What is really the Sabbath ?

The Sabbath is the 7th day of the week, which God ordained for rest.  One isn’t bound to a legal following of it in the NT, but one can if one wishes. Colossians 2:16-17 16) Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of a holy day, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath days: 17) Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. — Pastor Dave Raymond "I have more understanding than all my teachers: for thy testimonies are my meditation." – Psalm 119:99                / o{}xxxxx[]::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::                 "And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God:" – Ephesians 6:17

Response:

WHY NOT ASK GOD ABOUT THE SABBATH Q. Tell me, Lord, Do you have a special day of rest for Your followers? A. "I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day." Rev. 1:10 Q. But which day is the Lord’s Day? Which day are You Lord of? A. "The Son of man is Lord even of the Sabbath day." Matt. 12:8 Q. There are seven days in the week. Which day is the Sabbath day? A. "The seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God." (Fourth Commandment) Ex. 20:8 Q. Which day, according to our reckoning, is the seventh day, Saturday or Sunday? A. "And when the Sabbath was past, Mary Magdalene and Mary, the mother of James,…very early in the morning the first day of the week, they came unto the sepulchre at the rising of the sun…And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man…And he saith unto them, be not affrighted; Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified; he is risen." Mark 16:1-6. (Note: everybody knows that Sunday was the resurrection day. The Sabbath was past when it dawned. Thus it is evident that the Sabbath is Saturday, the day before Sunday.) Q. But, Lord, didn’t you abolish the law which contains the Sabbath commandment? A. "Think not that I am come to destroy the law or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." Matt. 5:17 Q. Well, at least, didn’t you change one of the commandments so that today your followers may keep another day than the seventh day? A. "For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled." Matt. 5:18 Q. But, Lord, isn’t Saturday a Jewish day? Isn’t the seventh day the Sabbath of the Jews? A. "The Sabbath was made for man." Mark 2:27 (The Sabbath was made and given to man 1500 years before the existence of a Jew. See Gen. 2:1-3) Q. Someone told me that after Your crucifixion, Lord, your followers no longer kept the seventh-day Sabbath according to the commandment. Is this true? A. "And that day was the Preparation day and the Sabbath drew on. And the women also, which came with Him from Galilee, followed after, and beheld the Sepulchre, and how His body was laid. And they returned and prepared spices and ointments; and rested the Sabbath day according to the commandment." Luke 23:54-56 Q. But didn’t the apostle Paul always meet with the early Christians on Sunday in honor of the resurrection? What was his manner in regard to a day of worship? A. "And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three Sabbath days reasoned with them out of the Scriptures." Acts 17:2 Q. Did he meet with the Gentile converts on the Sabbath, too? Perhaps he met with the Jews on the Sabbath and the Greeks on Sunday. What about that? A. "And he reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks." Acts 18:4 Q. What did Paul teach in regard to Sabbath keeping? A. "There therefore remaineth a keeping of the Sabbath (margin) to the people of God. For he that is entered into his rest, he also hath ceased from his own works as God did from His." Heb. 4:9,10 Q. But, which day did Paul mean when he spoke of resting as God did? A. "For He spake in a certain place of the seventh day on this wise, ‘And God did rest the seventh day from all His works’" Heb. 4:4 Q. Is this, then, your instruction in regard to Sabbath keeping? A. "For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God." Acts 20:27 (In the New Testament there are no less than 59 references to the Sabbath. The book of Acts records 84 Sabbaths on which the Apostle Paul and his associates held religious services. Yet there is not one word in the entire Bible authorizing Sunday keeping.) Q. Then why is it so many people keep Sunday instead of Saturday? If the Bible teaches Sabbath keeping, how and by whom was Sunday keeping introduced into Christianity? A. "And he (the ‘little horn’ power) shall speak great words against the Most High,…and think to change times and laws." Dan. 7:25 Q. The Roman Catholic Church is the little horn of Daniel 7; Do you mean that it should think to change the law of God? A. "Ask now the priests concerning the law." Haggai 2:11 Q. Very well, I will ask Stephen Keenan, a Catholic Priest: Does your church think it has the power to change the law of God? A. "Had she not such power, she could not have done that in which all modern religionists agree with her; she could not have substituted the observance of Sunday, the first day of the week, for the observance of Saturday, the seventh day of the week, a change for which there is no Scriptural authority." Doctrinal Catechism, page 174 Q. When was this change made? A. "We observe Sunday instead of Saturday because the Catholic Church in the Council of Laodicea (364 A.D.) transferred the solemnity from Saturday to Sunday." The Converts’ Catechism, Peter Geirmann, page 50. (This catechism received the pope’s blessing on Jan. 25, 1910.) Q. Do Protestant ministers agree with this? A. Congregationalist : "It is quite clear that however rigidly or devotedly we may spend Sunday, we are not keeping the Sabbath." Dr. R.W. Dale, The Ten Commandments, page 106. Methodist : "Sabbath in the Hebrew language signifies rest and is the seventh day of the week,…and it must be confessed that there is no law in the New Testament concerning the first day." Buck’s Theological Dictionary. Baptist : "There was and is a commandment to keep holy the Sabbath day, but that Sabbath day was not Sunday. It will be said, however, and with some show of triumph, that the Sabbath was transferred from the seventh to the first day of the week…Where can the record of such a transfer be found? Not in the New Testament – absolutely not…Of course, I quite well know that Sunday did not come into use in early Christian history…But what a pity that it comes branded with the mark of paganism, and christened with the name of the sun god, when adopted and sanctioned by the Papal apostasy, and bequeathed as a sacred legacy to Protestantism." – Dr. E.T Hiscox, author of the Baptist Manual. Q. What difference does it make which day I keep? A day is a day isn’t it? A. "Know ye not that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness? Romans 6:16 Q. Then what shall I do, obey the Sabbath of God’s commandment or keep the Sunday of man? A. "We ought to obey God rather than men." Acts 5:29 Q. Well, Lord, what do You think of Sunday keeping? A. "Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition…But in vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men." Matthew 15:6,9 Q. But surely the millions of people who keep Sunday can’t be wrong, can they? A. "Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction and many there be which go in thereat: because strait is the gate and narrow is the way that leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it." Matt. 7:13,14 (Only a few obeyed God in the days of Noah, in the days of Lot, in the days of Christ. The majority were lost.) Q. But Dr. So-and-so is a very wise man: Why doesn’t he and all the great preachers keep the Sabbath? A. "For ye see your calling, brethren, how that not many wise men after the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called; but God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty." 1 Cor. 1:26,27. (Note: The great religious teachers in Christ’s day rejected the truth also. His followers were of the common people.) Q. But I have accepted Jesus; I know He is my Saviour; I know He has accepted me and I have been keeping Sunday. Surely I would not be lost if I did not keep the Sabbath now, would I? A. "A time of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men everywhere to repent." Acts 17:30 Q. I know you, Lord. You wouldn’t condemn me for breaking the Sabbath, would you? A. "He that saith, I know Him, and keepeth not His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him." 1 John 2:4 Q. But isn’t it sufficient that I love the Lord and live by the law of love? A. "If ye love Me, keep My commandments." John 14:15 Q. Does that mean all ten of them? A. "For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all." James 2:10 Q. Well, I think that if we try to follow Jesus, that is all that is necessary. Isn’t that right, Jesus? A. "He that saith he abideth in Him, ought himself also so to walk even as He walked." 1 John 2:6 Q. How did you walk, Lord, what was your custom? A. "And He came to Nazareth, where He had been brought up; and, as His custom was, He went into the synagogue on the Sabbath day and stood up for to read." Luke 4:16 Q. But, Lord, that was over 1900 years ago. Wouldn’t you keep some other day than Saturday if you should come to earth today? A. "I am the Lord, I change not." Mal. 3:6 "Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, and today, and for ever." Heb. 13:8 Q. Does my salvation depend upon my obedience to this Sabbath injunction? A. "And being made perfect, He became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey Him." Heb. 5:9 Q. Do you think it would be absolutely necessary to keep the commandments to receive eternal life? A. "If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments." Matt. 19:17 Q. But I still can’t see why You insist on the seventh day, Lord. Isn’t Sunday as good as Saturday? A. "God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it." Gen. 2:3 "He hath blessed and I cannot reverse it." Num. 23:20. "For Thou blessest, O Lord, and it shall be blessed for ever." 1 Chron. 17:27 Q. Well, it seems to me that if I keep one day in seven, regardless of which one, that ought to be good enough. A. "There is a way that seemeth right unto a man; but the end thereof are the ways of death." Prov. 16:25 "Spiritual … read more »

Response:

Question:

But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. The only purpose and meaning of life is for man to find his way back to his Creator.

I see the resident moron is still alive and kicking.  Too bad. — Robyn Resident Witchypoo #1557

Response:

Life is a test to see if humans will allow themselves to be led around by their noses. It’s a test of character. Christians and Moslems etc. have already failed the test. Adam and Eve however passed the test and God got so angry that he threw them out of the garden.

As was scripted. — Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale. Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme Court who  will ensure church and state are joined at the hip like clergy and altar boys. America 1776-Jan 2001  RIP

Response:

 But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this.

The only purpose and meaning of life is for man to find his way back to his Creator. http://dorewilliamson.com/mysteries.html — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – [snip] But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. A worthy question.  I too am honestly curious to know what believers have to say about this.  It’s always been my opinion that this _need_ for purpose is the source of a lot of misery and suffering.  I’ve never believed in any cosmic "Why?", so I don’t get bollixed up trying to figure things out. Someone who is kind, compassionate, well-loved dies in some tragically comic way, and people tear their hair out trying to understand why God would do that.  Some devious asshole lies and cheats his way to a megafortune and lives happily ever after.  Why?   There is no rational answer.  But since many people do not understand why living a good life is its own reward, they assume that we non-believers don’t either.  If you don’t have a God and an idea of Hell, then they can’t imagine what would prevent a non-believer from choosing the life of the rich devious asshole. I’m probably never going to be rich or famous.  My life will not affect the course of future history very much.  I’ll be forgotten within a generation or two.  What matters to me is that I’ll be happy.  People will like me. Friends will value my companionship.  Hopefully, through kindness and compassion, I’ll be able to spread a little good around.  That’s all the "purpose" I need.  And I don’t need a God to tell me this.

Yes, but you’ve not only got two functioning neurons to rub together, but you’re not afraid to use them. — Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale. Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme Court who  will ensure church and state are joined at the hip like clergy and altar boys. America 1776-Jan 2001  RIP

Response:

47.

Heathen.  The correct answer is 42.

Response:

47. Heathen.  The correct answer is 42.

That’s what I thought it was. Maybe he and the other poster were taking into account inflation. — Andrew W. (Paranormal Agnostic) An interest in the paranormal (spiritual) but with acknowledgement that it’s existence can neither be proved nor disproved (agnostic). "How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us."  ~ Pope Leo X (1513-1521) Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner

Response:

God already answered this question… read the FAQ dummy! www.GodAlrighty.com/faq.htm

"God" neither answers a damn thing or ‘alrighty,’ top-posting moron. — Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale. Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme Court who  will ensure church and state are joined at the hip like clergy and altar boys. America 1776-Jan 2001  RIP

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. It has always been a bit of a mystery to me why the theists think that adding a magical super-being adds "meaning" to life.  Instead of being scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an impersonal Universe, we are scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an inscrutable, immortal magician? Why is that any more "meaningful?" The only explanation that I can come up with is that if God is running things, you cannot be held personally responsible if anything gets fucked up.  In that way, belief in God is more of a "responsibility reliever" than a "meaningfulness augmenter."

SSSSSsssshhhhhhh, don’t try to inject facts when Christians are involved, they tend to have temper tantrums. — Contempt of Congress meter reading-offscale. Hello, theocracy with a fundamentalist US Supreme Court who  will ensure church and state are joined at the hip like clergy and altar boys. America 1776-Jan 2001  RIP

Response:

alt.atheism – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. I just figured out the meaning of life. Unfortunately the subject is too complex to discuss.

Yes. I know that. And now you’re in. The black helicopters will be picking you up anytime now. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this.

Life has no meaning. Life *is*. Like any other animal on earth, we strive to survive. We humans are born to widely different cultures, environments and parenting skills. We are all alike in our basic needs (food, drink, shelter, clothing). Whatever our cultural inheritance, we tend to stick by it. Xtians mostly become xtians, muslins mostly become muslims, jews become jewish, etc. It’s when you try to diverge from your heritage that you become an "infidel", and you are rejected from the group. Anyway, you make your life as you see fit. For some, it’s more comforting to join the group/village/religion. For others, it’s more rewarding to reject any of them. Just assume your choices. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

– Olrik aa #1981 Qualified SMASH member EAC Chief Food Inspector, Bacon Division

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this.

I don’t know about purpose, but I have goals within my life. Some are short term. what I will do tomorrow, some re intermediate, what I will do in the next week month or year, and some are longer term, what I want to do in the next five or tens years. I don’t know that my life has any more overall ‘purpose’ than any of the countless other living organisms on this planet. — John Hachmann aa #1782 -The ability to change one’s mind, ideas, and opinions when confronted with new facts is the sign of the rational and intelligent. The inability to do so is the hallmark of the dimwitted and the fanatic. This applies not only to science and philosophy, but also to politics.-

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this.

I am so glad you asked. "The meaning of Life"… hmm, let’s see. Hmm. Right now, I can’t think of an answer. I’ll think about it and get back to you. — Freedom of thought entails no "Intellectual Property".

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this.

I just figured out the meaning of life. Unfortunately the subject is too complex to discuss. — Freedom of thought entails no "Intellectual Property".

Response:

Life is a test to see if humans will allow themselves to be led around by their noses. It’s a test of character. Christians and Moslems etc. have already failed the test. Adam and Eve however passed the test and God got so angry that he threw them out of the garden. — Andrew W. How well we know what a profitable superstition this fable of Christ has been for us.  ~ Pope Leo X (1513-1521) Religion Exposed! http://members.optusnet.com.au/~ajwerner

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

[snip] But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this.

A worthy question.  I too am honestly curious to know what believers have to say about this.  It’s always been my opinion that this _need_ for purpose is the source of a lot of misery and suffering.  I’ve never believed in any cosmic "Why?", so I don’t get bollixed up trying to figure things out. Someone who is kind, compassionate, well-loved dies in some tragically comic way, and people tear their hair out trying to understand why God would do that.  Some devious asshole lies and cheats his way to a megafortune and lives happily ever after.  Why?   There is no rational answer.  But since many people do not understand why living a good life is its own reward, they assume that we non-believers don’t either.  If you don’t have a God and an idea of Hell, then they can’t imagine what would prevent a non-believer from choosing the life of the rich devious asshole. I’m probably never going to be rich or famous.  My life will not affect the course of future history very much.  I’ll be forgotten within a generation or two.  What matters to me is that I’ll be happy.  People will like me. Friends will value my companionship.  Hopefully, through kindness and compassion, I’ll be able to spread a little good around.  That’s all the "purpose" I need.  And I don’t need a God to tell me this. — "By this logic, teaching anti-discrimination against ethnic minorities is  going to turn white people black."      –OrangeSFO on rec.gambling.poker

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. It has always been a bit of a mystery to me why the theists think that adding a magical super-being adds "meaning" to life.  Instead of being scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an impersonal Universe, we are scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an inscrutable, immortal magician? Why is that any more "meaningful?"

They’ve been brainwashed to think that. And don’t realise just how stupidly nasty it is to accuse the unbrainwashed of having meningless lives. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -The only explanation that I can come up with is that if God is running things, you cannot be held personally responsible if anything gets fucked up.  In that way, belief in God is more of a "responsibility reliever" than a "meaningfulness augmenter."

Response:

Ware lept out of the bushes shouting: What is a "meaning of life"?

What do you *mean by that? — Mark K. Bilbo  -  a.a. #1423 EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion Alt-atheism website at: http://www.alt-atheism.org "Being surprised at the fact that the universe is fine tuned for life is akin to a puddle being surprised at how well it fits its hole" — Douglas Adams

Response:

For your consideration: No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end.

Nominated portion begins: It has always been a bit of a mystery to me why the theists think that adding a magical super-being adds "meaning" to life.  Instead of being scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an impersonal Universe, we are scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an inscrutable, immortal magician?  Why is that any more "meaningful?" The only explanation that I can come up with is that if God is running things, you cannot be held personally responsible if anything gets fucked up.  In that way, belief in God is more of a "responsibility reliever" than a "meaningfulness augmenter."

Nominated portion ends. Nice stuff, Mark. Seconds? -Panama Floyd, Atl aa#2015, Member KoB! The EAC: We won’t rest until *every* helicopter is black.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – For your consideration: No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. Nominated portion begins: It has always been a bit of a mystery to me why the theists think that adding a magical super-being adds "meaning" to life.  Instead of being scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an impersonal Universe, we are scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an inscrutable, immortal magician? Why is that any more "meaningful?" The only explanation that I can come up with is that if God is running things, you cannot be held personally responsible if anything gets fucked up.  In that way, belief in God is more of a "responsibility reliever" than a "meaningfulness augmenter." Nominated portion ends. Nice stuff, Mark. Seconds? -Panama Floyd, Atl aa#2015, Member KoB! The EAC: We won’t rest until *every* helicopter is black.

Seconded! BK AA#1992

Response:

No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end.

It has always been a bit of a mystery to me why the theists think that adding a magical super-being adds "meaning" to life.  Instead of being scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an impersonal Universe, we are scared, lonely primates at the mercy of an inscrutable, immortal magician?  Why is that any more "meaningful?" The only explanation that I can come up with is that if God is running things, you cannot be held personally responsible if anything gets fucked up.  In that way, belief in God is more of a "responsibility reliever" than a "meaningfulness augmenter." — MarkA (still caught in the maze of twisty little passages, all different)

Response:

47

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

God already answered this question… read the FAQ dummy! www.GodAlrighty.com/faq.htm

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

47.

Response:

There is no meaning of life. There is just living. We are born, live, enjoy, suffer and die. Enjoy it while you have it. Don’t be punished and suffer from false worries and concerns about whether some non existent god approves or not of your living. Certainly don’t compromise your present life in the hope of some non existent life to come. Dead is dead – accept it. — Bill

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – No the subject’s not a typo. Honest. Trust me. A lot, well, some, posts that get copied to alt.atheism (aa) seek to demonstrate that atheists must perceive no "meaning of life," and thus QED (Quod erat DEMONstrandum, I think, in this instance) atheism if not wrong, is at least, a bit of a dead end. If anyone is interested, I’d be interested to know what you resident believers in alt.bible and alt.religion.Christian.roman-catholic understand by the term "the meaning of life". Because it’s something of a mystery to me, though perhaps not in the technical theological sense…. For example, would you think that "purpose to life" is a better term than "meaning of life"? For example: I live. I have various purposes within the context of my life. These range from the trivial to what I consider to be the important. In some sense I derive meanings from these purposes. But it seems to me that assigning an overarching "meaning of life" to my life as opposed to recognising "purposes within life" is a bit problematic, and I’d be interested in your views on this. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

Question:

My Brothers and sisters: THE ORACLES

I’m having trouble installing version 9.2.0 on a single-node cluster.

Response:

Your anti-virus definitions are way out of date! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG antivirus software. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

My Brothers and sisters: THE ORACLES …

Hey! LISTEN, Pal: beyond a certain point, you’re SPAM. You have definitely crossed that threshold. If you have a point to make, you should be able to do it in a sentence or two. I may not speak for absolutely everyone here, but spamming this newsgroup with many pages of religious dogma is not something I’m sure the majority here particularly welcomes, nor appreciates. This is besides the fact that it is WAY off topic here … Duh? So, for any number of intelligent reasons, GOODBYE. Dig? Zoid Or am I feeding a troll here?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – My Brothers and sisters: THE ORACLES "Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of hosts." -Zec 4:6 So, by the spirit of the LORD may the mustard seed cover the Heavens, and sprout unto Earth. May the Gospel be preached unto the ends of the earth, the full Gospel including the Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave unto us. [*]1. the dragon is the Devil [*]2. the woman represents the seed of Christ [*]3. the first beast represents 7 citys, 10 countrys, and 10 appointed leaders . [*]4. the second beast is the United States of America [*]5. 666 IS the number of a MAN [*]6. BABYLON THE GREAT MOTHER OF HARLOTS represents APOSTATE RELIGIONS AROUND THE WORLD [*]7. the Two Witnesses are Two Angels of the LORD 1. -The Dragon- *Rev 12:3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. *Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. [*] the dragon is the devil 2. -The Woman- *Rev 12:1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars. *Rev 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. [*] the SEEDS are the woman, those who keep the commandments and confess Jesus Christ, and the seeds (bride) are Christ’s (groom), born of the promise of Abraham. The devil hates her, and Christ. He attacks the seed wherever they go. Galatians 3:29 – And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. 3. -The First beast- *Rev 13:1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. *Rev 17:9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. *Rev 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. *Rev 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. *Rev 17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. *Rev 17:17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. [*] This first beast has 7 heads (citys) 10 horns (countrys) and 10 crowns (appointed leaders.) Babylon the great mother of harlots sits upon her. Heads are mountains and mountains represent cities,"to rise above a plain". The 7 kings are the seven leaders of Rome. 5 were before Jesus time, 1 was during Jesus time and the 7th is soon to come (perhaps already here.) Mountains and hills are also big obstacles . The Bible says the dragon GAVE his POWER and AUTHORITY to the BEAST. And a harlot sits upon her. [*] Why is she so great ? See the 7 headed "Babylon the great" below. 4. -The second beast- *Rev 13:11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. *Rev 13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. *Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: *Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. [*] USA- By both appearance and manner,this "creature" is unlike the rest. The others are Nations representing conquest and revolution to obtain power, but this creature was seen "coming up out of the earth"-instead of overthrowing other powers to establish itself, the nation represented here must arise in a terrtory previously unoccupied,and grow up gradually and peacefully. And had two horns like a lamb may represent youth, innocense, and gentleness-fitly representing the character of the United States when presented to the prophets as "coming up" in 1798. One nation, and only one, meets the specs of this Prophecy. It points to the United States of America. *Dan 8:3 Then I lifted up mine eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river a ram which had two horns: and the two horns were high; but one was higher than the other, and the higher came up last. *Dan 8:20 The ram which thou sawest having two horns are the kings of Media and Persia. *Dan 8:21 And the rough goat is the king of Grecia: and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king. *Dan 8:22 Now that being broken, whereas four stood up for it, four kingdoms shall stand up out of the nation, but not in his power. {*} Daniel’s end time prophecy tells us that the kings of Media and Persia ARE two horns, but of a ram, not a lamb. Keep in mind- a matured male lamb a ram be, and Iraq is maturing quickly under the new leadership of what appears to be a he goat, indeed an evil force.  The first horn (leader) was broken off and 4 more rose up from it.  Depicted as a he goat born of Greece, the 4 leaders that attack the kings of Media (Iran) and Persia (Iraq) are not under the power of Greece, but of the devil.  The he goat batters the ram. 5. -666- *Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. [*] 666 IS the number of a MAN, this man is the leader of the organization that tries to take the place of the TRUE God. G5516-Strongs reads: chi xi stigma, khee xee stig’-ma, The 22nd, 14th and an obsolete letter (G4742 as a cross) of the Greek alphabet (intermediate between the 5th and 6th), used as numbers; denoting respectively 600, 60 and 6; 666 as a numeral: – six hundred threescore and six.  In a passage which is included in the Roman Catholic Canon Law (Paris 1612), or Corpus Juris Canonici, Pope Innocent III declares that the Roman pontiff IS "the vicegerent upon earth, not of a mere man, but of very God", and in the gloss on the passage it is explained that this is because he is the vicegerent of Christ, who is "very God and very man". The words "Dominum Deum nostrum Papam" ("Our Lord God the Pope") occur in column 153. In several editions published since 1612 the word "Deum" ("God") has been omitted.  Pope Innocent did not realise what He was doing, He was Innocent but  the seat was taken by the devil. So, if your deacon, your pastor, your best friend, your brother, your sister, your mama, or even the pope himself says "This man is Christ", or "I am Christ" DONT believe it.  Because once you believe it and speak it and WORSHIP a false Christ  who comes with or without power and might, it is too late to change your mind.  The mark of the devil will be upon you. *It is the devils mark on man for worshiping a false Christ, or God. God has a mark, and so does the Devil.  Threader of the hour with ziggy in hand, It is left  to you to reveal  this man. Believe it or not, Satan has a taste for religous fools.  He even respects the LORD of Lords and Host of Hosts. There will be many false Christs, Not just one. Thats why the LORD spoke in this manner: ******* Mat 24:25 Behold, I have told you before******* The mark is IN your forehead, which is to say in your mind, or IN your right hand, what your mind creates with your hands. Can a physical mark somehow inscribed on or in our bodies really make us pleasing or displeasing to God? Do I think Catholic followers are Evil, NO I DO NOT. They are worshipping as best they know. Its not the Man that’s Bad, its the seat he represents. Woe unto the false Christs, there shall be weeping and knashing of teeth. 6. -Babylon the Great, the harlot- *Rev 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. *Rev 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. *Rev 17:18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth. *Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth. [*] represents APOSTATE RELIGIONS FROM ALL AROUND THE WORLD as presented by 7 citys (heads) and 10 leaders (horns) of the world. A conjecture of Cities: 1. Rome 2. N.Y. City 3. Hong Kong 4. Marseilles 5. Jerusalem 6. Bagdad 7. Los Angeles Concerning the two witnesses (see below), we are told that Babylon the great IS a SPIRITUAL city: *Rev 11:8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. A SPIRITUAL city compromising of Apostate Religions and the seat of the devil himself. Here IS A Letter to that

… read more »

Response:

My Brothers and sisters: THE ORACLES "Not by might, nor by power, but by my spirit, saith the LORD of hosts." -Zec 4:6 So, by the spirit of the LORD may the mustard seed cover the Heavens, and sprout unto Earth. May the Gospel be preached unto the ends of the earth, the full Gospel including the Revelation of Jesus Christ which God gave unto us. [*]1. the dragon is the Devil [*]2. the woman represents the seed of Christ [*]3. the first beast represents 7 citys, 10 countrys, and 10 appointed leaders . [*]4. the second beast is the United States of America [*]5. 666 IS the number of a MAN [*]6. BABYLON THE GREAT MOTHER OF HARLOTS represents APOSTATE RELIGIONS AROUND THE WORLD [*]7. the Two Witnesses are Two Angels of the LORD 1. -The Dragon- *Rev 12:3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven; and behold a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and seven crowns upon his heads. *Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. [*] the dragon is the devil 2. -The Woman- *Rev 12:1 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars. *Rev 12:17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ. [*] the SEEDS are the woman, those who keep the commandments and confess Jesus Christ, and the seeds (bride) are Christ’s (groom), born of the promise of Abraham. The devil hates her, and Christ. He attacks the seed wherever they go. Galatians 3:29 – And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise. 3. -The First beast- *Rev 13:1 And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy. *Rev 17:9 And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. *Rev 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. *Rev 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. *Rev 17:12 And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast. *Rev 17:17 For God hath put in their hearts to fulfil his will, and to agree, and give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God shall be fulfilled. [*] This first beast has 7 heads (citys) 10 horns (countrys) and 10 crowns (appointed leaders.) Babylon the great mother of harlots sits upon her. Heads are mountains and mountains represent cities,"to rise above a plain". The 7 kings are the seven leaders of Rome. 5 were before Jesus time, 1 was during Jesus time and the 7th is soon to come (perhaps already here.) Mountains and hills are also big obstacles . The Bible says the dragon GAVE his POWER and AUTHORITY to the BEAST. And a harlot sits upon her. [*] Why is she so great ? See the 7 headed "Babylon the great" below. 4. -The second beast- *Rev 13:11 And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon. *Rev 13:12 And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed. *Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: *Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. [*] USA- By both appearance and manner,this "creature" is unlike the rest. The others are Nations representing conquest and revolution to obtain power, but this creature was seen "coming up out of the earth"-instead of overthrowing other powers to establish itself, the nation represented here must arise in a terrtory previously unoccupied,and grow up gradually and peacefully. And had two horns like a lamb may represent youth, innocense, and gentleness-fitly representing the character of the United States when presented to the prophets as "coming up" in 1798. One nation, and only one, meets the specs of this Prophecy. It points to the United States of America. *Dan 8:3 Then I lifted up mine eyes, and saw, and, behold, there stood before the river a ram which had two horns: and the two horns were high; but one was higher than the other, and the higher came up last. *Dan 8:20 The ram which thou sawest having two horns are the kings of Media and Persia. *Dan 8:21 And the rough goat is the king of Grecia: and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king. *Dan 8:22 Now that being broken, whereas four stood up for it, four kingdoms shall stand up out of the nation, but not in his power. {*} Daniel’s end time prophecy tells us that the kings of Media and Persia ARE two horns, but of a ram, not a lamb. Keep in mind- a matured male lamb a ram be, and Iraq is maturing quickly under the new leadership of what appears to be a he goat, indeed an evil force.  The first horn (leader) was broken off and 4 more rose up from it. Depicted as a he goat born of Greece, the 4 leaders that attack the kings of Media (Iran) and Persia (Iraq) are not under the power of Greece, but of the devil.  The he goat batters the ram. 5. -666- *Rev 13:18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. [*] 666 IS the number of a MAN, this man is the leader of the organization that tries to take the place of the TRUE God. G5516-Strongs reads: chi xi stigma, khee xee stig’-ma, The 22nd, 14th and an obsolete letter (G4742 as a cross) of the Greek alphabet (intermediate between the 5th and 6th), used as numbers; denoting respectively 600, 60 and 6; 666 as a numeral: – six hundred threescore and six.  In a passage which is included in the Roman Catholic Canon Law (Paris 1612), or Corpus Juris Canonici, Pope Innocent III declares that the Roman pontiff IS "the vicegerent upon earth, not of a mere man, but of very God", and in the gloss on the passage it is explained that this is because he is the vicegerent of Christ, who is "very God and very man". The words "Dominum Deum nostrum Papam" ("Our Lord God the Pope") occur in column 153. In several editions published since 1612 the word "Deum" ("God") has been omitted.  Pope Innocent did not realise what He was doing, He was Innocent but the seat was taken by the devil. So, if your deacon, your pastor, your best friend, your brother, your sister, your mama, or even the pope himself says "This man is Christ", or "I am Christ" DONT believe it.  Because once you believe it and speak it and WORSHIP a false Christ who comes with or without power and might, it is too late to change your mind.  The mark of the devil will be upon you. *It is the devils mark on man for worshiping a false Christ, or God. God has a mark, and so does the Devil.  Threader of the hour with ziggy in hand, It is left  to you to reveal this man. Believe it or not, Satan has a taste for religous fools.  He even respects the LORD of Lords and Host of Hosts. There will be many false Christs, Not just one. Thats why the LORD spoke in this manner: ******* Mat 24:25 Behold, I have told you before******* The mark is IN your forehead, which is to say in your mind, or IN your right hand, what your mind creates with your hands. Can a physical mark somehow inscribed on or in our bodies really make us pleasing or displeasing to God? Do I think Catholic followers are Evil, NO I DO NOT. They are worshipping as best they know. Its not the Man that’s Bad, its the seat he represents. Woe unto the false Christs, there shall be weeping and knashing of teeth. 6. -Babylon the Great, the harlot- *Rev 17:3 So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns. *Rev 17:5 And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. *Rev 17:18 And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth. *Rev 18:24 And in her was found the blood of prophets, and of saints, and of all that were slain upon the earth. [*] represents APOSTATE RELIGIONS FROM ALL AROUND THE WORLD as presented by 7 citys (heads) and 10 leaders (horns) of the world. A conjecture of Cities: 1. Rome 2. N.Y. City 3. Hong Kong 4. Marseilles 5. Jerusalem 6. Bagdad 7. Los Angeles Concerning the two witnesses (see below), we are told that Babylon the great IS a SPIRITUAL city: *Rev 11:8 And their dead bodies shall lie in the street of the great city, which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified. A SPIRITUAL city compromising of Apostate Religions and the seat of the devil himself. Here IS A Letter to that Spiritual Church that still lives today–note, ALL the 7 LETTERS, SEVEN still apply to Churchs today my brother or sister, blessed is he who reads aloud in a Church: *Rev 2:12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges; *Rev 2:13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth. *Rev 2:14 But I have a few things against thee, … read more »

Response:

Question:

"Jack Smith" how is the Vatican and the Roman Catholic faith any different from Islamic Fundamentalists and murdering Muslim Terrorists. Well, for one, we’re right. Secondly, we kicked their asses out of Europe. You Prods

**  Prods are what men of God insert into children.  Prots (spit) are goddamned Protestants.   should thank the Catholics for preserving Christianity when under attack from the infidels.

**  Alas, ’tis true.  Unfortunately, the infidels currently have much crude oil.   Otherwise you guys would be the suicide bombers today.

**  Christian suicide bombers?  Without an eternally blissful reward of gorgeous women and/or cute boys, not at all likely.  Muhammad’s Paradise is way better thought out than Christian Heaven because, unlike Christian Heaven, it has that which heterosexuals cherish, that which homosexuals relish, and, for bi-sexuals, everything they want.   The only thing that is lacking in Muhammad’s Paradise is a reward of 72 cute guys with adequate equipment, who know how to use it.  This is probably why there are so few female Muslim suicide bombers.   Ref:  –  Qur’an: verse 52:24:  " … … young boys of their own, as fair of pearls." —  Qur’an: verse 76:19:  " They shall be attended by boys graced with eternal youth, who to their beholder’s eyes will seem like sprinkeled pearls.    When you gaze upon that scene you will behold a kingdom blissful and glorious." —

Question:

Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. The truth of the matter is:  Ellen G. White is the antichrist and the prophecy is fullfilled of its coming when Ellen came.

Hardly, Ellen White doesn’t RULE the world, doesn’t have the finances, nor does she belong to the globalists and New World Order, and is basically an unknown and always will be. — Dore www.dorewilliamson.com

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. The truth of the matter is:  Ellen G. White is the antichrist and the prophecy is fullfilled of its coming when Ellen came.

Response:

you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. Well that convinces me.  How do I get out?  Not. I’m not certain.  I suspect they still have me "on their books" even though I renounced their false religion in 1964 or so and have not attended since. But I suspect they still consider me "in," not "out." Theoretically at least, if you have joined a different church or faith then you are no longer Catholic; the difficulty being that most people who leave the Church rarely take the time to let the Church know (I suspect this is true of most denominations).

I am still probably one of their "numbers of members" though, that help them be "zillions strong" (roughly the same as the number of hamburgers sold by McDonalds)  :-) In any case, those of us who still believe it is the True Faith are going to take alot more convincing than the original poster attempted before we will believe that we are wrong.

We agree there. in Christ Jesus, Christian

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. The truth of the matter is:  Ellen G. White is the antichrist and the prophecy is fullfilled of its coming when Ellen came. Antichrist is a masculine noun. Anyone who denies that Christ is the Messiah is the antichrist, mel or fem, doesn’t matter.

I’m assuming *the* antichrist, means a specific antichrist. The prince that shall come. The 666 guy. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – — Teresita

Response:

Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. The truth of the matter is:  Ellen G. White is the antichrist and the prophecy is fullfilled of its coming when Ellen came. Antichrist is a masculine noun.

Anyone who denies that Christ is the Messiah is the antichrist, mel or fem, doesn’t matter. — Teresita

Response:

Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. The truth of the matter is:  Ellen G. White is the antichrist and the prophecy is fullfilled of its coming when Ellen came.

Antichrist is a masculine noun.

Response:

The truth of the matter is:  Ellen G. White is the antichrist and the prophecy is fullfilled of its coming when Ellen came.

The People’s Christian Bulletin identified the Beast with one of the founders of the Seventh-Day Adventist Church, Ellen Gould White (1827-1915). The scheme is similar to that used for the Pope, with U representing Roman numeral V and W (double U) standing for V + V, or 10: E  L   L  E N       G O U  L     D      W H I T E      50 50                    5 50 500    10    1     666 — Teresita

Response:

Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late.

The truth of the matter is:  Ellen G. White is the antichrist and the prophecy is fullfilled of its coming when Ellen came.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. Well that convinces me.  How do I get out?  Not. I’m not certain.  I suspect they still have me "on their books" even though I renounced their false religion in 1964 or so and have not attended since. But I suspect they still consider me "in," not "out." Theoretically at least, if you have joined a different church or faith then you are no longer Catholic; the difficulty being that most people who leave the Church rarely take the time to let the Church know (I suspect this is true of most denominations). I am still probably one of their "numbers of members" though, that help them be "zillions strong" (roughly the same as the number of hamburgers sold by McDonalds)  :-)

Well, I suspect you might be considered Catholic somewhere, but naturally, most estimates regarding the number of Catholics in America and elsewhere in the world come from census or other data, not from official church roles. In any case, those of us who still believe it is the True Faith are going to take alot more convincing than the original poster attempted before we will believe that we are wrong. We agree there.

Since you called the Catholic Church False earlier, I rather doubt it. — Bill

Response:

So if he had a conscience, speaking ex cathedra, he would tell the world that he cannot be infallible, that only god is infallible. you missed the point. He is infalliable on Church dogma and affairs.

Bullshit!  Who gave an ecumenical council authority to pronounce him as infallible? who gave Martin Luther the authority to translate the new testement?

Luther claimed he got some of his best inspirations while sitting on the toilet and taking a dump, that’s what gives Luther the authority. Are you claiming that because this view has been held since the earliest days of the church that it gives it any credence? why shouldnt it?

Why should it?

Response:

Bush looks like the prophesied beast 666. With over 20,000 women and children killed in Iraq and Bush not apologizing or even admitting that it was an error. He has fooled alot of good people. His deception has caused many to support him and his evil deeds – to think that he is doing good things when in fact he is terrorizing the hell out of the Iraqi people so that rich american pignessmen can get richer.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – | Because google only returns true information right? | Yes he is. | Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this | false church before it is too late. | | no google can return false information. The only source of absolute | truth is the authorised version of the bible. The pope however claims | to be infallible which is blasphemous. Huh? Authorized by who? An English king with an agenda? And what’s a Russian or Chinese to do? Learn English  to be saved? ‘Sola scriptura’ is the heresy here. Jesus is the absolute truth Andrew.

This is funny considering the King never made such a statement.  Get your history right! Second, every religion has its ‘authorised books’, even Catholicism. Are they all wrong? — Alan "Ferrit" Ferris  ()’.’.’()  ( (T) )  ( ) . ( )  (")_(")

Response:

you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : Because google only returns true information right? Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. no google can return false information. The only source of absolute truth is the authorised version of the bible. The pope however claims to be infallible which is blasphemous.

Oh the NASB, NIV, NKJV, NLB, and many other versions of the Bible are just as good as the kjv.  The kjv is an okay version, but it was not based upon very good New Testament transcripts, and its rules for translation were pretty bad.   Personally I prefer the New King James.  It has much better and more complete texts in the background of its New Testament word choices. In the Name of Jesus, Christian

Response:

you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. Well that convinces me.  How do I get out?  Not.

I’m not certain.  I suspect they still have me "on their books" even though I renounced their false religion in 1964 or so and have not attended since. But I suspect they still consider me "in," not "out." Christian

Response:

Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late.

Well, having communed with the great god of knowledge, Google ("If it’s on the internet, then it must be true!"), I have been granted the wisdom of the ages… and several hundred "the Pope is the antichrist" theories. Apparently, Pius XII was the antichrist… well, sort of, but John XXIII was definitely supposed to be the Evil One… but he died, so then Paul VI must have been it… But, the world didn’t end before John Paul I came along, and he got to be the antichrist for only about a month. Now, they’re absolutely sure, WITHOUT A DOUBT, that John Paul II is the antichrist… unless he dies, then the next Pope will CERTAINLY be the antichrist. Noticing a trend, I did further research… and, oddly enough, just about every Pope for the last 300 years or so has been the antichrist. Now, I was under the impression that this antichrist person was to be 1 single individual, not a continuously reincarnating entity. Maybe you are getting the antichrist and the Dalai Lama confused. Well, *I’M* certainly confused. As a card-carrying Catholic, it will take more to convince me that the Church is false. Can you elaborate on this? Thanks, Hugh

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Because google only returns true information right? Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. no google can return false information. The only source of absolute truth is the authorised version of the bible. The pope however claims to be infallible which is blasphemous. Ummm, which is the authorised version of the Bible?  And who authorized it?  And how do we know they had the authority to authorize it?  Catholics know the Bible is authoritative because of Tradition and the Church has the authority by Tradition to authorize certain translations of the Bible. What is tradition but the habits of man?

Tradition is the preserved oral teachings of Jesus and the Apostles (Paul included).  It is not habits or anything like that. The Pope is not infallible in every day affairs, only when he speaks ex cathedra, explicitly as head of the church on a matter of doctrine or dogma.  And the Pope does not himself claim to be infallible but rather was declared infallible at an ecumenical council which have been held to be infallible since the earliest days of the church. So if he had a conscience, speaking ex cathedra, he would tell the world that he cannot be infallible, that only god is infallible. Who gave an ecumenical council authority to pronounce him as infallible? Are you claiming that because this view has been held since the earliest days of the church that it gives it any credence?

The problem with your argument is that if the Pope is in fact infallible, it would be both impossible and wrong for him to pronounce himself otherwise.  Regarding ecumenical councils, they are held to be infallible because ever since the Council of Jerusalem, as detailed in Acts, the leadership of the Church acting in ecumenical council is believed to be infallible. Without Tradition and without the belief in the infallibility of Church Councils (and by extension the Pope), there is really no basis for Faith.  Educated Catholics recognize that without that basis, there is no reason to believe that the Bible is in fact the inspired word of God.  Why do we belive in Tradition?  Because we have always believed in Tradition; the apostles would have believed in Tradition. Why do we believe in the Bible?  Because it agrees with what we know to be true from Tradition (Remember Christians existed for several centuries before any of the Canons of scriptures accepted in any of the Christian were finalized). — Bill

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. Well that convinces me.  How do I get out?  Not. I’m not certain.  I suspect they still have me "on their books" even though I renounced their false religion in 1964 or so and have not attended since. But I suspect they still consider me "in," not "out."

Theoretically at least, if you have joined a different church or faith then you are no longer Catholic; the difficulty being that most people who leave the Church rarely take the time to let the Church know (I suspect this is true of most denominations). In any case, those of us who still believe it is the True Faith are going to take alot more convincing than the original poster attempted before we will believe that we are wrong. — Bill McHale

Response:

So if he had a conscience, speaking ex cathedra, he would tell the world that he cannot be infallible, that only god is infallible.

you missed the point. He is infalliable on Church dogma and affairs.  Who gave an ecumenical council authority to pronounce him as infallible?

who gave Martin Luther the authority to translate the new testement? Are you claiming that because this view has been held since the earliest days of the church that it gives it any credence?

why shouldnt it?

Response:

Because google only returns true information right? Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. no google can return false information. The only source of absolute truth is the authorised version of the bible. The pope however claims to be infallible which is blasphemous.

Ummm, which is the authorised version of the Bible?  And who authorized it?  And how do we know they had the authority to authorize it?  Catholics know the Bible is authoritative because of Tradition and the Church has the authority by Tradition to authorize certain translations of the Bible. The Pope is not infallible in every day affairs, only when he speaks ex cathedra, explicitly as head of the church on a matter of doctrine or dogma.  And the Pope does not himself claim to be infallible but rather was declared infallible at an ecumenical council which have been held to be infallible since the earliest days of the church. — Bill

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Because google only returns true information right? Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late. no google can return false information. The only source of absolute truth is the authorised version of the bible. The pope however claims to be infallible which is blasphemous. Ummm, which is the authorised version of the Bible?  And who authorized it?  And how do we know they had the authority to authorize it?  Catholics know the Bible is authoritative because of Tradition and the Church has the authority by Tradition to authorize certain translations of the Bible.

What is tradition but the habits of man? The Pope is not infallible in every day affairs, only when he speaks ex cathedra, explicitly as head of the church on a matter of doctrine or dogma.  And the Pope does not himself claim to be infallible but rather was declared infallible at an ecumenical council which have been held to be infallible since the earliest days of the church.

So if he had a conscience, speaking ex cathedra, he would tell the world that he cannot be infallible, that only god is infallible. Who gave an ecumenical council authority to pronounce him as infallible? Are you claiming that because this view has been held since the earliest days of the church that it gives it any credence?

Response:

you posted in alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic : Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late.

No, he is not.  No more so than Muhammed, joe smith, or sun myung moon. He is just a false prophet, a false leader, and a heretic. Christian

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – | | | Because google only returns true information right? | | Yes he is. | | Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this | | false church before it is too late. | | | | no google can return false information. The only source of absolute | | truth is the authorised version of the bible. The pope however claims | | to be infallible which is blasphemous. | | Huh? Authorized by who? An English king with an agenda? And what’s a Russian | or Chinese to do? Learn English  to be saved? ‘Sola scriptura’ is the heresy | here. Jesus is the absolute truth Andrew. | | This is funny considering the King never made such a statement.  Get | your history right! | | Second, every religion has its ‘authorised books’, even Catholicism. | Are they all wrong? | | | — | Alan "Ferrit" Ferris | |  ()’.’.’() |  ( (T) ) |  ( ) . ( ) |  (")_(") Are you replying to my post or Andrew’s?

Yours, though this is not a support of Andrew.  It is simply you used false grounds to defend your position. — Alan "Ferrit" Ferris  ()’.’.’()  ( (T) )  ( ) . ( )  (")_(")

Response:

Because google only returns true information right? Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late.

no google can return false information. The only source of absolute truth is the authorised version of the bible. The pope however claims to be infallible which is blasphemous.

Response:

Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late.

Response:

Because google only returns true information right?

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late.

Response:

Yes he is. Please do a search on google and find out the truth. Come out of this false church before it is too late.

Well that convinces me.  How do I get out?  Not. Bill

Response:

Question:

<snip @@  Good point, Paul.  By giving a pregnant woman no choice but to deliver a baby with iniencephaly – who will die shortly after birth – the anti-choice folks believe they are pleasing God.   So would it then be fair to say that the pro-choice crowd thinks it is pleasing to God when abortions are performed because a baby would be inconvenient right now, or the woman wants to look good at the holidays, or think she’ll have better luck finding a husband if she is not a single mom?

@@  Would it be fair to deny an abortion to a woman who is carrying a baby with  inienocephaly, who will die within three days of being born, just because some women fail to take protective measures prior to coitus? As a general observation, not aimed at anyone in particular: it seems that extreme examples can be found at both ends of most arguments over complex issues. Such examples rarely help us get to the truth.  They do, however, provide ammunition for those that just want to argue and throw mud. We (American society) seem to have fallen in love with black, and with white.  Poor grey is getting little serious attention at all these days.

@@  good point, Bob. —

Question:

Socialist scumbag in a dress, Pope JP II, supports an international income tax administered by the UN.  What kind of moron would still support a corrupt organization like the Roman Catholic church? I mean, besides child molesters. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040926/D85BCB9G0.html

Response:

alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic, John Galt to   alt.religion.christian.roman-catholic Socialist scumbag in a dress, Pope JP II, supports an international income tax administered by the UN.  What kind of moron would still support a corrupt organization like the Roman Catholic church? I mean, besides child molesters. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040926/D85BCB9G0.html

While not a Roman Catholic, I’m unclear how a UN administered tax on the relatively rich constitutes supporting the RCC. Perhaps you could explain. — "Do Unto Others As You Would Have Them Do Unto You." – Attrib: Pauline Reage. Inexpensive VHS & other video to CD/DVD conversion? See: <http://www.Video2CD.com. 35.00 gets your video on DVD. all posts to this email address are automatically deleted without being read. ** atheist poster child #1 ** #442.

Response:

Socialist scumbag in a dress, Pope JP II, supports an international income tax administered by the UN.  What kind of moron would still support a corrupt organization like the Roman Catholic church? I mean, besides child molesters. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20040926/D85BCB9G0.html While not a Roman Catholic, I’m unclear how a UN administered tax on the relatively rich constitutes supporting the RCC. Perhaps you could explain.

You have it backwards:  it’s not that the UN tax would support the RCC, but the RCC is in favor of the UN tax.  Get it? The morons in question are not the UN, but those who still donate money to the RCC (aka child molesting socialist friends of Fidel Castro). Taxation is theft and all polticians are crooks.

Response:

Question:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Is it any wonder NOT A SINGLE Catholic has responded to what’s in this post? Guilt? Of course it’s guilt. They know truth when it’s THAT BLUNT. Strange how they KNOW what they’re doing is deadly to their own children, and when someone alerts them of it they "conveniently" ignore it. It’s like all those people that walked around the "certain man that fell among thieves and was beaten" in Luke chapter 10. Only difference now is, IT’S THEIR OWN SONS BODY LAYING IN THE STREET THAT THEY WALK PAST, AROUND, AVOID, AND IGNORE all so they can continue to defend the men raping him! And before you say I have you all killfiled so why bother responding. This never stopped you before! The NG is loaded with proof. So save yourself the embarrassment and the sin of lying. Pray for these people!

Why bother responding?  Most Priests are not homosexuals but you continue to cast all as such even after correction.  This was a case where an issue was found out and action was taken.  People sin, it’s in the bible.

Response:

Is it any wonder NOT A SINGLE Catholic has responded to what’s in this post? Guilt? Of course it’s guilt. They know truth when it’s THAT BLUNT. Strange how they KNOW what they’re doing is deadly to their own children, and when someone alerts them of it they "conveniently" ignore it. It’s like all those people that walked around the "certain man that fell among thieves and was beaten" in Luke chapter 10. Only difference now is, IT’S THEIR OWN SONS BODY LAYING IN THE STREET THAT THEY WALK PAST, AROUND, AVOID, AND IGNORE all so they can continue to defend the men raping him! And before you say I have you all killfiled so why bother responding. This never stopped you before! The NG is loaded with proof. So save yourself the embarrassment and the sin of lying. Pray for these people! — …Nicholas www.RemnantofGod.org

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – PROOF CATHOLICS DON’T LOVE THEIR SONS A few weeks ago an Austrian Seminary is caught red handed not only raping young boys that they were supposedly training to become priests, they are caught with over 40,000 homosexual pornographic pictures and videos of those young boys with their Sodomite instructor priests. Not only did the Vatican know about this YEARS ago and let this happen, they are now once again sheltering these admitted child rapists!? On September 12, 2004 the Associated Press ran a story in the Dallas morning news that Rome is sheltering at least 7 priests that have admitted to child rape in the United states. The Vatican is refusing to release them to United States authorities for prosecution as we speak! I have an honest question to ask every Catholic out there. And I pray you don’t get offended. Because this is a question on all non-Catholic minds now-a-days. If you stay in this church now you have proven to the world at large you not only approve of the Sodomites raping your sons, you declare you will defend their right to do so! Sadly, this is how the world sees our dear Catholic friends now! How else can they see you in any other light after all this? You no longer have the excuse your Sodomite priests are sorry for what they did and you are giving them a second chance, because this is the 10th, 50th or even 100th chance in some cases. If they were sorry for raping your sons, your pope would not be protecting them from prosecution, and your Sodomite priests would stop attacking your sons on a daily basis! And I do not apologize for calling them Sodomites. I am only trying to let you know what the Scriptures bluntly define them as. There is nothing "gay" about this, and calling them Homosexual is also starting to be more accepted lately. These men are Sodomites! Nothing more, nothing less. What will it take for you to leave this homosexual owned and operated church now? Do your sons have to contract the AIDS virus from these Sodomites before you bother to protect your very own children? If so, what are you going to say to your little boys when they ask mommy and daddy why you kept them in harms way KNOWING the priests you left them alone with lusted after their little bodies and eventually gave them the deadly virus AIDS!? What will you say to your little boys when they lay dying of AIDS in your arms because YOU refused to protect them from these men you protected? Will you admit to your sons that you chose rather to defend the Sodomite who craved your little boy’s body instead? Will you admit to your children you knew the Sodomite priest was lusting after your son even after they find out they had AIDS? Will you admit to your child you knew he was in grave danger and you truly didn’t care for him? Will you admit you knew your Pope protected his attackers so as to allow them to rape him? Will you admit to your son that Sodomite priests are worth protecting far greater then he is? Will you admit to your son that he is dying, and will never grow up to be a man with a life, a career, a wife, or a family because you thought it was far better to let the AIDS infested Sodomites have their way with him? Will you admit you kept him in harms way because you didn’t want to admit "Bible thumpers" were right about your church leaders? Will you admit you ignored the reports that proved your priests were dying of AIDS 11 times greater then anyone else in the USA and still felt safe to leave your son with them? Is your pride more important to you then you very own son’s life IS YOUR SON NOT WORTH PROTECTING? Orders May Have Sheltered Molester Priests Sunday, September 12, 2004 Associated Press DALLAS – Some Roman Catholic religious orders have been sheltering priests in Rome despite claims that the men sexually abused minors, according to The Dallas Morning News. Of the seven accused priests the newspaper located, one has been indicted in Arizona, but refuses to return to face the charges. Two others had admitted to abuse years ago, but now face additional claims. Supervisors of the accused clergy said they were not trying to help the men elude law enforcement or victims, but wanted to give them a place to live and work away from children, the newspaper reported. In one case, the Rev. Joseph Henn (search), a member of the Salvatorian order, was indicted last year in Arizona on child molestation charges. The Diocese of Phoenix, where he had worked, had already reached a settlement with one of his accusers in the 1990s, the newspaper said. Salvatorian officials said in a written statement to the newspaper that they had told Henn to return and face authorities, but he refused. The Arizona prosecutor in his case, Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley, noted that priests take vows of obedience and said Henn’s superiors have the authority to order him back to America. In another case, the Rev. Barry Bossa (search), a member of the Pallottines order, was criminally charged last year in Massachusetts. He has been accused of sexually abusing young boys in the 1970s, when he taught at a Bridgewater, Mass., parish. Bossa had separately pleaded guilty in 1974 to misdemeanor sexual abuse. A colleague of Bossa’s who had monitored him in the United States, the Rev. Terzo Vinci, said the religious order moved Bossa to Rome to isolate him from children and now he was unable to return because of his health. "It’s not a promotion," Vinci said. "He went to Rome in exile. Zero promotion. Zero anything." The Rev. James Tully (search), of the Xaverian Missionary Fathers, was moved to Rome two years ago, about a month after he was accused of inappropriately touching a boy several decades earlier, the newspaper said. Tully had pleaded no contest to disorderly conduct in 1992 for giving alcohol to three boys and grabbing one of them. An official with Tully’s order said his transfer to Rome was unrelated to the abuse allegations. The official said the clergyman was recovering from working in war-torn parts of Africa and was not ready for ministry in the United States. The newspaper identified the men as part of a yearlong investigation that found more than 200 priests accused of abuse have been moved from country to country. Nearly half of the cases involved clergy who tried to elude law enforcement, the newspaper said FOR MORE INFO… * Hundreds of facts regardign Sodomite Child Rapists and your children http://www.remnantofgod.org/rccsex.htm * Roman Catholic Sodomite priests dying of AIDS 11 time greater then anyone else! http://www.remnantofgod.org/RCC-AIDS.htm — …Nicholas www.RemnantofGod.org

Response:

PROOF CATHOLICS DON’T LOVE THEIR SONS A few weeks ago an Austrian Seminary is caught red handed not only raping young boys that they were supposedly training to become priests, they are caught with over 40,000 homosexual pornographic pictures and videos of those young boys with their Sodomite instructor priests. Not only did the Vatican know about this YEARS ago and let this happen, they are now once again sheltering these admitted child rapists!? On September 12, 2004 the Associated Press ran a story in the Dallas morning news that Rome is sheltering at least 7 priests that have admitted to child rape in the United states. The Vatican is refusing to release them to United States authorities for prosecution as we speak! I have an honest question to ask every Catholic out there. And I pray you don’t get offended. Because this is a question on all non-Catholic minds now-a-days. If you stay in this church now you have proven to the world at large you not only approve of the Sodomites raping your sons, you declare you will defend their right to do so! Sadly, this is how the world sees our dear Catholic friends now! How else can they see you in any other light after all this? You no longer have the excuse your Sodomite priests are sorry for what they did and you are giving them a second chance, because this is the 10th, 50th or even 100th chance in some cases. If they were sorry for raping your sons, your pope would not be protecting them from prosecution, and your Sodomite priests would stop attacking your sons on a daily basis! And I do not apologize for calling them Sodomites. I am only trying to let you know what the Scriptures bluntly define them as. There is nothing "gay" about this, and calling them Homosexual is also starting to be more accepted lately. These men are Sodomites! Nothing more, nothing less. What will it take for you to leave this homosexual owned and operated church now? Do your sons have to contract the AIDS virus from these Sodomites before you bother to protect your very own children? If so, what are you going to say to your little boys when they ask mommy and daddy why you kept them in harms way KNOWING the priests you left them alone with lusted after their little bodies and eventually gave them the deadly virus AIDS!? What will you say to your little boys when they lay dying of AIDS in your arms because YOU refused to protect them from these men you protected? Will you admit to your sons that you chose rather to defend the Sodomite who craved your little boy’s body instead? Will you admit to your children you knew the Sodomite priest was lusting after your son even after they find out they had AIDS? Will you admit to your child you knew he was in grave danger and you truly didn’t care for him? Will you admit you knew your Pope protected his attackers so as to allow them to rape him? Will you admit to your son that Sodomite priests are worth protecting far greater then he is? Will you admit to your son that he is dying, and will never grow up to be a man with a life, a career, a wife, or a family because you thought it was far better to let the AIDS infested Sodomites have their way with him? Will you admit you kept him in harms way because you didn’t want to admit "Bible thumpers" were right about your church leaders? Will you admit you ignored the reports that proved your priests were dying of AIDS 11 times greater then anyone else in the USA and still felt safe to leave your son with them? Is your pride more important to you then you very own son’s life IS YOUR SON NOT WORTH PROTECTING? Orders May Have Sheltered Molester Priests Sunday, September 12, 2004 Associated Press DALLAS – Some Roman Catholic religious orders have been sheltering priests in Rome despite claims that the men sexually abused minors, according to The Dallas Morning News. Of the seven accused priests the newspaper located, one has been indicted in Arizona, but refuses to return to face the charges. Two others had admitted to abuse years ago, but now face additional claims. Supervisors of the accused clergy said they were not trying to help the men elude law enforcement or victims, but wanted to give them a place to live and work away from children, the newspaper reported. In one case, the Rev. Joseph Henn (search), a member of the Salvatorian order, was indicted last year in Arizona on child molestation charges. The Diocese of Phoenix, where he had worked, had already reached a settlement with one of his accusers in the 1990s, the newspaper said. Salvatorian officials said in a written statement to the newspaper that they had told Henn to return and face authorities, but he refused. The Arizona prosecutor in his case, Maricopa County Attorney Rick Romley, noted that priests take vows of obedience and said Henn’s superiors have the authority to order him back to America. In another case, the Rev. Barry Bossa (search), a member of the Pallottines order, was criminally charged last year in Massachusetts. He has been accused of sexually abusing young boys in the 1970s, when he taught at a Bridgewater, Mass., parish. Bossa had separately pleaded guilty in 1974 to misdemeanor sexual abuse. A colleague of Bossa’s who had monitored him in the United States, the Rev. Terzo Vinci, said the religious order moved Bossa to Rome to isolate him from children and now he was unable to return because of his health. "It’s not a promotion," Vinci said. "He went to Rome in exile. Zero promotion. Zero anything." The Rev. James Tully (search), of the Xaverian Missionary Fathers, was moved to Rome two years ago, about a month after he was accused of inappropriately touching a boy several decades earlier, the newspaper said. Tully had pleaded no contest to disorderly conduct in 1992 for giving alcohol to three boys and grabbing one of them. An official with Tully’s order said his transfer to Rome was unrelated to the abuse allegations. The official said the clergyman was recovering from working in war-torn parts of Africa and was not ready for ministry in the United States. The newspaper identified the men as part of a yearlong investigation that found more than 200 priests accused of abuse have been moved from country to country. Nearly half of the cases involved clergy who tried to elude law enforcement, the newspaper said FOR MORE INFO… * Hundreds of facts regardign Sodomite Child Rapists and your children http://www.remnantofgod.org/rccsex.htm * Roman Catholic Sodomite priests dying of AIDS 11 time greater then anyone else! http://www.remnantofgod.org/RCC-AIDS.htm — …Nicholas www.RemnantofGod.org

Response: