Catholics & Catholicism

Question:

Eat my <censored How do you figure?

MESSAGE FOR SHAN: Shan — you’re being as gross as Alan Craft. You say you like my posts because I come across as smarter than the average bear and/or godbot. Why is that? ANSWER: because I don’t have to resort to telling casual and weekend Idiots for Gawd ™ to <filth and foul and foul and filth. I know it’s frustrating to constantly hear the hypocritical "love the sinner" schtick. I know how aggravating the hypocrisy is. I know how maddening it is when confronting adherents of a cult with what their cult really teaches, just so that they’ll shut up about judging you, while they claim they’re not judging you. While I thank you for standing up for what is right and for trying to put a human face to their appeals of "those people," I have to say that resorting to "filth my foul" as a first, second, or even fiftieth response is probably not the best way to get your message across. In short, chill out. Those who espouse morally and intellectually bankrupt positions will eventually run out of gas, and *they* will have to resort to the old "filth and foul" attack. Then you can either take the moral high ground and laugh at them or roll in the muck with them. MESSAGE FOR SH’MA: TAKE THE HINT! maf and dog, aa #1954

Response:

Eat my cum and you’d become even smarter, shit face.

How do you figure?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Ya know — since we have here a bunch of people expressing their disapproval about one particular poster’s choice of language, and since the objection to the choices of "colorful metaphor" are an issue, I have a question for Sh’ma, Eddie, Michael Kellogg, Eusebius, Senator Palpatine, hughbetcha, lxckoasdjkoad, and anyone else who is troubled and/or offended by Shan’s "colorful metaphors": Why are you reserving your disdain for one particular poster, when your Christian brethren are saying the following: Easy… I didn’t read it. If I did, I would have said something. But you didn’t. And you still don’t. Now you know. Got more? Yeah, your strawman

No, that would be your strawman. REALITY: you ignore posts by others who use foul language. REALITY: you make excuses for your continued ignoring. REALITY: you don’t give a damn that your Christian brethren are doing the same things you whinge about from others. I see that you are out of arguments. Will you be repenting or addressing your shoddy behavior anytime soon? You are right… I ADMIT IT,

And how do you intend to rectify your shoddy behavior? I didn’t see the posts you quoted from. If I did I would have said something.

So you claim. However, your credibility is shot. Why? When you were confronted with your Xian brethren’s behavior, you immediately attacked me for mentioning it. Good tactic, there, Hoss. If someone else (be they Christian, Muslim, or whatever) talks like that in a thread I am following, I will comment on it.

Ah, so you won’t be correcting your shoddy behavior anytime soon. I would think that as a  "true Christian," you would want to disassociate yourself from the persons who demonstrate the reprobate behavior about which you have complained from others.   <snip lame excuse and lie As for them being my "Christian Bretheren" that jury is still out at the moment. The bagpipes serenading you must be deafening. Speaking of lack of coherence… what are you TALKING about?

Not my fault that you don’t understand a clear reference to the "no true Scotsman" fallacy, which is completely coherent and on-topic. <SNIP yet further profanity Written by your Xian brethren, no less. So you say…

Ah, when confronted with easily verifiable quotes from your Xian brethren, you cast aspersion on me. Not very honest of you. And not very bright, either. But, you have run like the wind when confronted with your own shoddy behavior and hypocrisy. And these are just the ones fit to print, people. There are plenty more where these came from. In my opinion, profanity is not fit to print. Yes, I have standards… yes they are not in align with everyone else’s…. no, I will not compramise them. I knew you would not be able to respond coherently. Tell me what you wanted to hear.

A coherent answer to the question, not your lame excuses. You are now fully aware that your Christian brethren are behaving exactly the way Shan does. You are offended by Shan’s behavior. Why are you not offended by your brethren’s equally shameful behavior? Why do you still refuse to speak out against your Xian brethren’s behavior?   I can’t be any more plain short of using Crayons…

Your "using" the crayons (most likely as a food supplement) would explain a lot. How simple did you want me to state it?

See above. The point was clearly and unambiguously that you are a raging hypocrite for chastising Shan for bad language and for being SILENT when your Xian brethren do the exact same thing to others. I guess it doesn’t matter to you as long as you’re just watching or claiming not to. Well, I guess you are using what is called an Ad Hominem argument.

P-K-B. Not very Christian of you, especially in the light of your cowardly refusal to examine your own behavior. And maybe if you knew what an ad hom argument was, you might be able to make a point. As it stands, you are merely dodging and weaving, whilst your brother in Christ, Mr. Alan Craft, is admonishing me for not lifting my rectum high enough for another poster to lick. Shame on you for blaming me for your refusal to act honorably and fairly.   An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument.

And I have not done this. Your hypocrisy is absolutely relevant. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, his/her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting).

1. Your character is in question, O Christian One. 2. Your refusal to act honorably is the evidence. Maybe if you knew what an ad hom argument actually was, you would not have to resort to whatever STRAW you can grab. So, do you only reserve your moral outrage for people whom you deem non-Christian? If so, where were you and your lackadaisical, selective moral outrage, when your Christian brethren were doing the very thing you decry? Please see my first comment. Excuses, excuses. But hey — keep on griping about Shan. After all, he’s not really a Xian, according to you, so he must be criticized. But it’s all good when your Xian brethren do the exact same thing. AD HOMINEM

Example: maf: Written by your Xian brethren, no less. sh’ma: So you say… AD HOMINEM, by calling into question the truthfulness of your opponent. Get it yet?   I don’t care if he is a "xian" (whatever that is…)

"Xian" is a common abbreviation for Christian. Ever see "Xmas"? As for me "deeming" him unChristian, if you followed his posts, you would see he outright said it. Fine. More proof that you are biased against non-Christians, to the point of chastising them and not your own Xian brethren for the same offensive behavior. Get it yet? AD HOMINEM–

No, truth. Learn the difference. I have not done any such thing and I challenge you to back up the accusations you are making.

LOL!   YOU are the one griping about Shan’s use of obscenities. Surely you must remember your own griping and complaining. YOU are making the assertion, presumably based on what Shan said, that Shan is not Christian. You just said that above. Surely you must remember that. YOU are the one avoiding chastising your Xian brethren for using foul language. The evidence (your gripes against allegedly non-Christian Shan and your silence when your Christian brethren use foul language) proves that: 1. you are biased against non-Christians. 2. you are a hypocrite, in that actions by your Xian brethren are overlooked while you decry the same actions from non-Christians. You also avoid a sincere and conscientious examination of your own behavior and the consequences of your chosen behavior, as evidenced by your making excuses and AD HOMINEM arguments against me. Oh, and don’t even try to shriek about argumentum ad hominem. It doesn’t wash when the topic of discussion is the person and their behavior. Now, if I were to say, "Your misuse of the phrase "ad hominem" to avoid discussing the point makes you a mental; midget," then you would have an honest, truthful point. Get it yet? <snip 2 end Now, let’s put your claims to the test. Go read: I eagerly await your response to that poster.

Response:

Ya know — since we have here a bunch of people expressing their disapproval about one particular poster’s choice of language, and since the objection to the choices of "colorful metaphor" are an issue, I have a question for Sh’ma, Eddie, Michael Kellogg, Eusebius, Senator Palpatine, hughbetcha, lxckoasdjkoad, and anyone else who is troubled and/or offended by Shan’s "colorful metaphors": Why are you reserving your disdain for one particular poster, when your Christian brethren are saying the following: Easy… I didn’t read it. If I did, I would have said something.

But you didn’t. And you still don’t. Now you know. Got more? As for them being my "Christian Bretheren" that jury is still out at the moment.

The bagpipes serenading you must be deafening. <SNIP yet further profanity

Written by your Xian brethren, no less. And these are just the ones fit to print, people. There are plenty more where these came from. In my opinion, profanity is not fit to print. Yes, I have standards… yes they are not in align with everyone else’s…. no, I will not compramise them.

I knew you would not be able to respond coherently. The point was clearly and unambiguously that you are a raging hypocrite for chastising Shan for bad language and for being SILENT when your Xian brethren do the exact same thing to others. I guess it doesn’t matter to you as long as you’re just watching or claiming not to. So, do you only reserve your moral outrage for people whom you deem non-Christian? If so, where were you and your lackadaisical, selective moral outrage, when your Christian brethren were doing the very thing you decry? Please see my first comment.

Excuses, excuses. But hey — keep on griping about Shan. After all, he’s not really a Xian, according to you, so he must be criticized. But it’s all good when your Xian brethren do the exact same thing. As for me "deeming" him unChristian, if you followed his posts, you would see he outright said it.

Fine. More proof that you are biased against non-Christians, to the point of chastising them and not your own Xian brethren for the same offensive behavior. Get it yet? There was no need for me to deduce that from what he offered so freely. Regardless of his religious (or lack of) affliation, I just commented on what was set before me.

You also have the same abuses coming from your Xian brethren set before you. Yet you stand by and remain SILENT. Your silence speaks volumes about your character.   I don’t think I caused him to start off with his anti-semetic rampage, but I admit when he refused to quit using foul language, I resorted to making sport of it. Could I have handled it better….? Sure, so take me off the "PERFECT HUMAN BEING" mailing list and revoke my membership… I admit I have flaws…  Get in line with Shan and sue me.

I knew you wouldn’t be able to respond coherently. No one is expecting you to be perfect. How about CONSISTENT? That’s not too much to ask. I really don’t expect that any of you will have the cajones to answer at all, let alone coherently. But exposing your hypocrisy and faux moral outrage was a good way to pass 5 minutes. As for having cajones… well… seems a little odd choce of words.

So sorry……. that you found something not the point to object to. Sub "a big enough pair" for cajones. That should mollify you, as you will be able to infer nay-nays or ta-tas, at your whim. Your question was valid, so I responded to it. Whether you "deem" it coherent or not is up to you.

Any coherence and/or lack thereof was your responsibility. Finally, the only thing you "exposed" was the fact that not all posters in NGs, read ALL the posts.

Your problem that your ignorance led to hypocrisy. I find neither error nor scandal in that "revelation" of yours. I hope this cleared up any misunderstanding you might have had on this topic.

Not my misunderstanding to clear up. The hypocrisy is YOURS to remedy. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -SHALOM!

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Ya know — since we have here a bunch of people expressing their disapproval about one particular poster’s choice of language, and since the objection to the choices of "colorful metaphor" are an issue, I have a question for Sh’ma, Eddie, Michael Kellogg, Eusebius, Senator Palpatine, hughbetcha, lxckoasdjkoad, and anyone else who is troubled and/or offended by Shan’s "colorful metaphors": Why are you reserving your disdain for one particular poster, when your Christian brethren are saying the following: Easy… I didn’t read it. If I did, I would have said something. But you didn’t. And you still don’t. Now you know. Got more?

Yeah, your strawman "Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda" argument. You are right… I ADMIT IT, I didn’t see the posts you quoted from. If I did I would have said something. If someone else (be they Christian, Muslim, or whatever) talks like that in a thread I am following, I will comment on it. As for the other threads, I am not the NG police… I cannot monitor all groups nor would I want to. So, keep your strawman. As for them being my "Christian Bretheren" that jury is still out at the moment. The bagpipes serenading you must be deafening.

Speaking of lack of coherence… what are you TALKING about? <SNIP yet further profanity Written by your Xian brethren, no less.

So you say… And these are just the ones fit to print, people. There are plenty more where these came from. In my opinion, profanity is not fit to print. Yes, I have standards… yes they are not in align with everyone else’s…. no, I will not compramise them. I knew you would not be able to respond coherently.

Tell me what you wanted to hear. I can’t be any more plain short of using Crayons… How simple did you want me to state it? The point was clearly and unambiguously that you are a raging hypocrite for chastising Shan for bad language and for being SILENT when your Xian brethren do the exact same thing to others. I guess it doesn’t matter to you as long as you’re just watching or claiming not to.

Well, I guess you are using what is called an Ad Hominem argument. An Ad Hominem is a general category of fallacies in which a claim or argument is rejected on the basis of some irrelevant fact about the author of or the person presenting the claim or argument. Typically, this fallacy involves two steps. First, an attack against the character of person making the claim, his/her circumstances, or her actions is made (or the character, circumstances, or actions of the person reporting the claim). Second, this attack is taken to be evidence against the claim or argument the person in question is making (or presenting). So, do you only reserve your moral outrage for people whom you deem non-Christian? If so, where were you and your lackadaisical, selective moral outrage, when your Christian brethren were doing the very thing you decry? Please see my first comment. Excuses, excuses. But hey — keep on griping about Shan. After all, he’s not really a Xian, according to you, so he must be criticized. But it’s all good when your Xian brethren do the exact same thing.

AD HOMINEM I don’t care if he is a "xian" (whatever that is…) As for me "deeming" him unChristian, if you followed his posts, you would see he outright said it. Fine. More proof that you are biased against non-Christians, to the point of chastising them and not your own Xian brethren for the same offensive behavior. Get it yet?

AD HOMINEM– I have not done any such thing and I challenge you to back up the accusations you are making. There was no need for me to deduce that from what he offered so freely. Regardless of his religious (or lack of) affliation, I just commented on what was set before me. You also have the same abuses coming from your Xian brethren set before you. Yet you stand by and remain SILENT. Your silence speaks volumes about your character.

Are you saying you want me to find the people based on the generic list of names you quoted and chastise them? By your standards, I would REALLY BE A HYPOCRITE. That is not the way I came across Shan. He happened to be posting vulgarity in a thread I was following. I did not seek him out. His comments were presented to me and everyone elso who read that thread. Try to stick with your own logic. I don’t think I caused him to start off with his anti-semetic rampage, but I admit when he refused to quit using foul language, I resorted to making sport of it. Could I have handled it better….? Sure, so take me off the "PERFECT HUMAN BEING" mailing list and revoke my membership… I admit I have flaws…  Get in line with Shan and sue me. I knew you wouldn’t be able to respond coherently.

Uh.. yeah… an explanation of my behavior was incoherent to your accusations… uh… ok… TELL ME WHAT YOU WERE WANTING TO HEAR????? I will respond to it if you as a coherent question… No one is expecting you to be perfect. How about CONSISTENT? That’s not too much to ask.

Where have I been INCONSISTENT? My posts are consistent throughout… wow.. I really don’t expect that any of you will have the cajones to answer at all, let alone coherently. But exposing your hypocrisy and faux moral outrage was a good way to pass 5 minutes. As for having cajones… well… seems a little odd choce of words. So sorry……. that you found something not the point to object to. Sub "a big enough pair" for cajones. That should mollify you, as you will be able to infer nay-nays or ta-tas, at your whim.

Uh… ok… Your question was valid, so I responded to it. Whether you "deem" it coherent or not is up to you. Any coherence and/or lack thereof was your responsibility.

It was coherent to my level of understanding… perhaps I need to bring it down to yours?? Finally, the only thing you "exposed" was the fact that not all posters in NGs, read ALL the posts. Your problem that your ignorance led to hypocrisy.

AD HOMINEM (again) I find neither error nor scandal in that "revelation" of yours. I hope this cleared up any misunderstanding you might have had on this topic. Not my misunderstanding to clear up. The hypocrisy is YOURS to remedy.

AD HOMINEM… (again) SHALOM!

Response:

catholic): My friend later instant messaged me about it and sent me the video of this man being slaughtered by the masked terrorists.

What a pal.  Honestly, why do people track that stuff down?  Are they THAT in need of a "shock" rush?  Do they think this kind of stuff really ought to be treated as entertainment??  A man was brutally slaughtered, for God’s sake.  Why would you want to watch that?? I couldnt help but cover my mouth and widen my eyes. I wanted to cry but i felt it wouldnt solve anything, at that moment i realized eveything that i have been taking for granted.

Well maybe it WAS for the best, then, that he sent it to you.  It made an impact. My family, my friends, even the people i dont like or disagree with. i didnt come here to preach to you people but after seeing what saw and then coming here for a somewhat healthy conversation with this group and seeing posting with people saying such horrible, degrading, superfluous things..

We say that about Shan sometimes, too. i cant help but feel that we are no better than the terroists.

WHOA, BIG FELLA!  Stop right there.  Now turn around and march straight back to your room, and think about that statement for a few minutes.   Because it’s THAT insane. Have you cut anyone’s head off lately?  Me neither. we give ourselves a false sense of power when we preach our views and close our minds off to anything else…kind of a terrorist mentality dont you think?

You’re ignoring the CONTENT of those views.  If we are preaching GOOD, then that’s fine.  If we’re preaching EVIL, like these animals in the video, then that’s bad.  In this society, young guys like you need to understand that it’s not only okay, but CRITICAL – that you make this distinction.  Your parents were taught the opposite, and that’s gotten us into a lot of trouble these past few decades. My brother served one year in iraq and from now on i will thank god…the same god that made me gay that he is here safe with a family that loves him.

Amen to that. I am frustrated and depressed at what i realized today…i realized that we are the lowest life forms on this earth…

I’d be depressed, too, if I thought that.  Fortunately, you have it backwards: We are the HIGHEST form of life on the planet.  Don’t indict an entire race based on the evil and insane actions of a few twisted individuals. i dont think i have ever seen an animal kill another without survival in mind but today i saw a human being killing another for a reason i dont comprehend. thankyou and try to respect what i had to say even if u disagree with it.

You’re on the right track, dd.  You SHOULD be thinking deeply about this kind of stuff at your age.  Most don’t, and the rest of society suffers for it. Go to church, dd.  Learn about good and evil, and how each manifests itself, physically, in the world today, so you can recognize it.  Don’t be afraid to make a judgement about what is good and what is evil.  Act accordingly. — God Bless,   Michael

Response:

doubt it. and the funny thing is he calls himself a Catholic. Perhaps he is a cafeteria Catholic because he only follows doctrine that he can live with. My fart knows more about theology and religion than 10,000 of folks like you combined.

He has a "Smart Fart"? Well… at least he’s got smarts coming from there….(hyuk hyuk)

Response:

Ya know — since we have here a bunch of people expressing their disapproval about one particular poster’s choice of language, and since the objection to the choices of "colorful metaphor" are an issue, I have a question for Sh’ma, Eddie, Michael Kellogg, Eusebius, Senator Palpatine, hughbetcha, lxckoasdjkoad, and anyone else who is troubled and/or offended by Shan’s "colorful metaphors": Why are you reserving your disdain for one particular poster, when your Christian brethren are saying the following:

Easy… I didn’t read it. If I did, I would have said something. As for them being my "Christian Bretheren" that jury is still out at the moment. <SNIP yet further profanity And these are just the ones fit to print, people. There are plenty more where these came from.

In my opinion, profanity is not fit to print. Yes, I have standards… yes they are not in align with everyone else’s…. no, I will not compramise them. So, do you only reserve your moral outrage for people whom you deem non-Christian? If so, where were you and your lackadaisical, selective moral outrage, when your Christian brethren were doing the very thing you decry?

Please see my first comment. As for me "deeming" him unChristian, if you followed his posts, you would see he outright said it. There was no need for me to deduce that from what he offered so freely. Regardless of his religious (or lack of) affliation, I just commented on what was set before me. I don’t think I caused him to start off with his anti-semetic rampage, but I admit when he refused to quit using foul language, I resorted to making sport of it. Could I have handled it better….? Sure, so take me off the "PERFECT HUMAN BEING" mailing list and revoke my membership… I admit I have flaws…  Get in line with Shan and sue me. I really don’t expect that any of you will have the cajones to answer at all, let alone coherently. But exposing your hypocrisy and faux moral outrage was a good way to pass 5 minutes.

As for having cajones… well… seems a little odd choce of words. Your question was valid, so I responded to it. Whether you "deem" it coherent or not is up to you. Finally, the only thing you "exposed" was the fact that not all posters in NGs, read ALL the posts. I find neither error nor scandal in that "revelation" of yours. I hope this cleared up any misunderstanding you might have had on this topic. SHALOM!

Response:

Ya know — since we have here a bunch of people expressing their disapproval about one particular poster’s choice of language, and since the objection to the choices of "colorful metaphor" are an issue, I have a question for Sh’ma, Eddie, Michael Kellogg, Eusebius, Senator Palpatine, hughbetcha, lxckoasdjkoad, and anyone else who is troubled and/or offended by Shan’s "colorful metaphors": Why are you reserving your disdain for one particular poster, when your Christian brethren are saying the following: "…faggot…" — Joseph Geloso "….asshole…." Joseph Geloso "…..catamite…." Alan Craft "Bitch." — Alan Craft "Got that gown picked out yet, cupcake?" — Alan Craft "….Markie the Screeching Catamite…." Alan Craft "…..fuck…" — Scott "…fucking …" — My Two Angels "… you wouldn’t give a fuck…" Atilla <various references to fellatio and smegma — Scout Lady And these are just the ones fit to print, people. There are plenty more where these came from. So, do you only reserve your moral outrage for people whom you deem non-Christian? If so, where were you and your lackadaisical, selective moral outrage, when your Christian brethren were doing the very thing you decry? I really don’t expect that any of you will have the cajones to answer at all, let alone coherently. But exposing your hypocrisy and faux moral outrage was a good way to pass 5 minutes. maf and dog, aa #1954

Response:

doubt it. and the funny thing is he calls himself a Catholic. Perhaps he is a cafeteria Catholic because he only follows doctrine that he can live with. My fart knows more about theology and religion than 10,000 of folks like you combined. He has a "Smart Fart"? Well… at least he’s got smarts coming from there….(hyuk hyuk)

Eat my cum and you’d become even smarter, shit face.

Response:

Remember all this material is copyrighted and I will fry your ass for infringement of copyright. Add this to the collection too Sh’ma-myFart.

OOOH! MAN! This is GOLD! You post in a public forum and think it’s protected??? AH, HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!! If this is true… than the remarks you make to people are LIBEL and they can sue you!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!! SHALOM!

Response:

doubt it. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – and the funny thing is he calls himself a Catholic. Perhaps he is a cafeteria Catholic because he only follows doctrine that he can live with. My fart knows more about theology and religion than 10,000 of folks like you combined. Add this to the collection, shit-faces. Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like: "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT." AND "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?" AND "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up." And who could forget: "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it." Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore." at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic: "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

Response:

Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like:

#### "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT."

#### AND

#### "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?"

#### AND

#### "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up."

#### And who could forget:

#### "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it."

#### Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:

####  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore."

#### at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic:

#### "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

####

LOL!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like: "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT." AND "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?" AND "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up." And who could forget: "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it." Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore." at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic: "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

STOP THE PRINT JOB.  One more quote to full your mouths with because your brains are full of the same already: "Suck on my ass-hole when I have massive diarrhea" Love, Shan

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Does this fold up and store under my bed? Euse You’re a good fellow, I’ll send you a framed version on parchment; however, the bastards will receive shit from me because they can’t sell my "instructional course" in flushing down fundies down the sewers because of copyright infringement. They are too stupid to even come up with anything as original as my quotations, those sons of whores, especially this  "Sh’ma-Yisrael" who fucks his mother. Keep it up… I need more to make VOLUME II of "Shan’s Greatest Hits". HA HA!

Remember all this material is copyrighted and I will fry your ass for infringement of copyright. Add this to the collection too Sh’ma-myFart.

Response:

and the funny thing is he calls himself a Catholic. Perhaps he is a cafeteria Catholic because he only follows doctrine that he can live with. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like: "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT." AND "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?" AND "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up." And who could forget: "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it." Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore." at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic: "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

Response:

and the funny thing is he calls himself a Catholic. Perhaps he is a cafeteria Catholic because he only follows doctrine that he can live with.

My fart knows more about theology and religion than 10,000 of folks like you combined. Add this to the collection, shit-faces. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like: "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT." AND "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?" AND "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up." And who could forget: "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it." Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore." at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic: "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

Response:

Does this fold up and store under my bed? Euse

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like: "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT." AND "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?" AND "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up." And who could forget: "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it." Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore." at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic: "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

Response:

Does this fold up and store under my bed? Euse

You’re a good fellow, I’ll send you a framed version on parchment; however, the bastards will receive shit from me because they can’t sell my "instructional course" in flushing down fundies down the sewers because of copyright infringement. They are too stupid to even come up with anything as original as my quotations, those sons of whores, especially this  "Sh’ma-Yisrael" who fucks his mother. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like: "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT." AND "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?" AND "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up." And who could forget: "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it." Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore." at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic: "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

Response:

"Suck on my ass-hole when I have massive diarrhea"

Every greatest hits album has to have at least one new single.

Response:

Does this fold up and store under my bed? Euse

Yes it does… and if you order today… we will throw in the TRAVEL EDITION!!!! Now, your kids can whittle away the hours on these modern classics.

Response:

Does this fold up and store under my bed? Euse You’re a good fellow, I’ll send you a framed version on parchment; however, the bastards will receive shit from me because they can’t sell my "instructional course" in flushing down fundies down the sewers because of copyright infringement. They are too stupid to even come up with anything as original as my quotations, those sons of whores, especially this  "Sh’ma-Yisrael" who fucks his mother.

Keep it up… I need more to make VOLUME II of "Shan’s Greatest Hits". HA HA!

Response:

Hey guys my name is eddie i am a sophmore in highschool. I read about this group on SSYGLB and how it is a good place for discussion which i am always interested in. Today i guess you could say i was enlightened. it wasnt by god or by a priest or monk not even a family memeber. I am sure you all recently heard on the news or paper that a young man from PA was beheaded in iraq. to be honest i didnt give it much thought…i just said to myself that is what happens in a war and we shouldnt be there anyway but thats beside the point. My friend later instant messaged me about it and sent me the video of this man being slaughtered by the masked terrorists. I couldnt help but cover my mouth and widen my eyes. I wanted to cry but i felt it wouldnt solve anything, at that moment i realized eveything that i have been taking for granted. My family, my friends, even the people i dont like or disagree with. i didnt come here to preach to you people but after seeing what saw and then coming here for a somewhat healthy conversation with this group and seeing posting with people saying such horrible, degrading, superfluous things.. i cant help but feel that we are no better than the terroists. we give ourselves a false sense of power when we preach our views and close our minds off to anything else…kind of a terrorist mentality dont you think? My brother served one year in iraq and from now on i will thank god…the same god that made me gay that he is here safe with a family that loves him. I am frustrated and depressed at what i realized today…i realized that we are the lowest life forms on this earth…i dont think i have ever seen an animal kill another without survival in mind but today i saw a human being killing another for a reason i dont comprehend. thankyou and try to respect what i had to say even if u disagree with it.

Response:

Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection.

Now, THAT’s funny! H.

Response:

Now for the first time ever… Shan’s hate-filled foul-mouthed insults in one collection. You’ll get gems like: "Wow!  You love my shit and call it pearls!  You are really smart, NOT." AND "Fuck Muhammad, Ali, and all their whores of wives, don’t you think?" AND "You need a cannon up your ass to wake up." And who could forget: "I’ll wash my ass-hole and you can suck it." Yes… if you order today, we will even throw in:  "Shit on your Torah and Talmud, son of a whore." at no extra cost… but wait, there’s more…. if you say you heard it on GOOGLE, we will throw in this timeless classic: "I am indeed grateful to all morons who reproduce my post and re-disseminate them by reposting them. Thank you, thank you, thank you."

Response: