Question:
In order to truly get at the root of the problem, the imperative question is why has the homosexuality of priests resulted in the molestation of adolescent boys?
Because religion turns ordinary decent homosexuals into predatory perverts. Don’t ban homosexuality : instead, reform the Catholic church. If those lazy bishops aren’t prepared to supervise their underlings, they should be sued for punitive damages until they are bankrupted.
Response:
Because religion turns ordinary decent homosexuals into predatory
perverts. Documentation please? Just a scrap will do. BAM
Response:
In order to truly get at the root of the problem, the imperative question is why has the homosexuality of priests resulted in the molestation of adolescent boys? Because religion turns ordinary decent homosexuals into predatory perverts. Don’t ban homosexuality : instead, reform the Catholic church. If those lazy bishops aren’t prepared to supervise their underlings, they should be sued for punitive damages until they are bankrupted.
Over the years whenever I brought up the subject of pedophile clergymen of Roman Catholic Church with my in laws the answer I received was the good ole a few Bad Apples nonsense. Only now are we finding out the whole damn church is corrupt beyond redemption and now that the insurance companies refusing to insure celibate priests they stupid Church may have to rethink their position of their harmful stand.
Response:
Over the years whenever I brought up the subject of pedophile clergymen of Roman Catholic Church with my in laws the answer I received was the good ole a few Bad Apples nonsense.
If you look at what is happening, it is not "pedophilia". Most of the cases inolve homo priests and tennage boys. That is not pedophilia. There is a huge majority of cases involving the Homo priest – tennage boy compared to Hetero-priest – tennage girl. In fact if you were to take out the former from the equation, what’s left would be barely newsworthy. Personally I don’t understand how a "straight" teenage boy or girl could be taken advantage of without their consent – unless it was a lewd act that didn’t involve both of them. I’m not defending the priests – I’m just questioning the sincerity of the plaintiffs who claim to be "damaged" decades later. BAM
Response:
Personally I don’t understand how a "straight" teenage boy or girl could be taken advantage of without their consent – unless it was a lewd act that didn’t involve both of them. I’m not defending the priests – I’m just questioning the sincerity of the plaintiffs who claim to be "damaged" decades later.
A sixteen year old boy or girl against a 30 year old man? Paul… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – BAM
Response:
A sixteen year old boy or girl against a 30 year old man?
When I was 16 there weren’t many 30 year olds I couldn’t knock the piss out of. As far as girls go – it’s still a terrible thing – but I couldn’t imagine any priest getting near any of my sisters. They’d have bitten his hand off. BAM
If you like this post and would like to receive updates from this blog, please subscribe our feed.